• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学龄前儿童面向未来决策的发展差异与性别差异

Developmental and gender differences in future-oriented decision-making during the preschool period.

作者信息

Garon Nancy, Moore Chris

机构信息

Autism Research Centre, Dalhousie University, Nova Scotia, Canada.

出版信息

Child Neuropsychol. 2007 Jan;13(1):46-63. doi: 10.1080/09297040600762701.

DOI:10.1080/09297040600762701
PMID:17364563
Abstract

A child version of the Iowa Gambling task was used to explore the developmental and gender differences in decision making of 4-year-olds (N = 141). The task required children to choose between two decks: a deck with higher immediate rewards and a deck with higher future rewards. Developmental differences between young (4.0-4.5) and older (4.6-4.11) children were found, with older 4-year-olds choosing more from the deck with higher future rewards. Gender differences were found for decision-making strategy. It is suggested that these differences in approaches might account for the pattern of gender differences found in past research.

摘要

使用爱荷华赌博任务的儿童版本来探究4岁儿童(N = 141)决策中的发展差异和性别差异。该任务要求儿童在两副牌之间进行选择:一副牌有更高的即时奖励,另一副牌有更高的未来奖励。研究发现了年幼(4.0 - 4.5岁)和年长(4.6 - 4.11岁)儿童之间的发展差异,4岁以上儿童从有更高未来奖励的牌组中选择的更多。在决策策略方面发现了性别差异。有人认为,这些方法上的差异可能解释了过去研究中发现的性别差异模式。

相似文献

1
Developmental and gender differences in future-oriented decision-making during the preschool period.学龄前儿童面向未来决策的发展差异与性别差异
Child Neuropsychol. 2007 Jan;13(1):46-63. doi: 10.1080/09297040600762701.
2
Characterization of children's decision making: sensitivity to punishment frequency, not task complexity.儿童决策的特征:对惩罚频率敏感,而非任务复杂性。
Child Neuropsychol. 2005 Jun;11(3):245-63. doi: 10.1080/092970490911261.
3
Complex decision-making in early childhood.幼儿期的复杂决策
Brain Cogn. 2004 Jun;55(1):158-70. doi: 10.1016/S0278-2626(03)00272-0.
4
Awareness and symbol use improves future-oriented decision making in preschoolers.意识和符号使用有助于提高学龄前儿童的前瞻性决策能力。
Dev Neuropsychol. 2007;31(1):39-59. doi: 10.1207/s15326942dn3101_3.
5
Developmental and sex-related differences in preschoolers' affective decision making.学龄前儿童情感决策中的发育差异与性别差异
Child Neuropsychol. 2009 Jan;15(1):73-84. doi: 10.1080/09297040802266436. Epub 2008 Aug 11.
6
Development of "hot" executive function: the children's gambling task.“热”执行功能的发展:儿童赌博任务
Brain Cogn. 2004 Jun;55(1):148-57. doi: 10.1016/S0278-2626(03)00275-6.
7
Comparison of deck- and trial-based approaches to advantageous decision making on the Iowa Gambling Task.基于牌面和试次的优势决策制定方法在 Iowa 赌博任务中的比较。
Psychol Assess. 2012 Jun;24(2):455-63. doi: 10.1037/a0025932. Epub 2011 Oct 31.
8
Negative affectivity predicts individual differences in decision making for preschoolers.消极情感性预示着学龄前儿童决策方面的个体差异。
J Genet Psychol. 2006 Dec;167(4):443-62. doi: 10.3200/GNTP.167.4.443-462.
9
A developmental study of risky decisions on the cake gambling task: age and gender analyses of probability estimation and reward evaluation.蛋糕赌博任务中风险决策的发展性研究:概率估计与奖励评估的年龄及性别分析
Dev Neuropsychol. 2008;33(2):179-96. doi: 10.1080/87565640701884287.
10
Improving children's affective decision making in the Children's Gambling Task.改善儿童在儿童赌博任务中的情感决策。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2015 Nov;139:18-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2015.05.005. Epub 2015 Jun 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Decomposing decision-making in preschoolers: Making decisions under ambiguity versus risk.幼儿决策分解:在模糊性与风险下做决策。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 30;19(9):e0311295. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311295. eCollection 2024.
2
It's All in How You Think About It: Construal Level and the Iowa Gambling Task.一切都取决于你如何看待它:解释水平与爱荷华赌博任务。
Front Neurosci. 2016 Jan 22;10:2. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2016.00002. eCollection 2016.
3
Construct validity of the Iowa Gambling Task.爱荷华赌博任务的结构效度。
Neuropsychol Rev. 2009 Mar;19(1):102-14. doi: 10.1007/s11065-009-9083-4. Epub 2009 Feb 5.