Yeung Kammy N K, Wong Lena L N
The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Int J Audiol. 2007 Jan;46(1):17-25. doi: 10.1080/14992020601102238.
The present study evaluated how well auditory steady state response (ASSR) and tone burst cortical evoked response audiometry (CERA) thresholds predict behavioral thresholds in the same participants. A total of 63 ears were evaluated. For ASSR testing, 100% amplitude modulated and 10% frequency modulated tone stimuli at a modulation frequency of 40Hz were used. Behavioral thresholds were closer to CERA thresholds than ASSR thresholds. ASSR and CERA thresholds were closer to behavioral thresholds at higher frequencies than at lower frequencies. Although predictions based on CERA thresholds are slightly more accurate than ASSR thresholds, the differences may not be clinically significant, particularly when the degree of individual variations is considered. Prediction of hearing thresholds became more accurate when hearing loss increased. Due to variations in prediction across participants, a single correction factor cannot be used. Other factors must be considered in selecting whether to use CERA or ASSR in predicting behavioral thresholds.
本研究评估了听觉稳态反应(ASSR)和短纯音皮层诱发反应测听法(CERA)阈值在相同受试者中预测行为阈值的效果。总共评估了63只耳朵。进行ASSR测试时,使用了调制频率为40Hz、幅度调制为100%且频率调制为10%的纯音刺激。行为阈值更接近CERA阈值而非ASSR阈值。ASSR和CERA阈值在高频时比低频时更接近行为阈值。尽管基于CERA阈值的预测比ASSR阈值略准确,但差异可能在临床上不显著,尤其是考虑到个体差异程度时。听力损失增加时,听力阈值的预测变得更准确。由于不同受试者的预测存在差异,不能使用单一校正因子。在选择使用CERA还是ASSR来预测行为阈值时,必须考虑其他因素。