Flawed ethics recommendations of the U.S. EPA's human studies review board.
作者信息
Shrader-Frechette Kristin
出版信息
Environ Health Perspect. 2007 Jan;115(1):A17-8. doi: 10.1289/ehp.115-a17.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Flawed ethics recommendations of the U.S. EPA's human studies review board.美国环境保护局人体研究审查委员会存在缺陷的伦理建议。
Environ Health Perspect. 2007 Jan;115(1):A17-8. doi: 10.1289/ehp.115-a17.
2
EPA's 2006 human-subjects rule for pesticide experiments.美国环境保护局2006年关于农药实验的人体实验规定。
Account Res. 2007 Oct-Dec;14(4):211-54. doi: 10.1080/08989620701670161.
3
Ethics. Testing pesticides on humans given qualified endorsement.伦理。在获得合格认可的情况下对人体进行农药测试。
Science. 2004 Feb 27;303(5662):1272-3. doi: 10.1126/science.303.5662.1272a.
4
Toxicology. Academy panel mulls ethics of human pesticide experiments.毒理学。学术小组审议人体农药实验的伦理问题。
Science. 2003 Jan 17;299(5605):327-9. doi: 10.1126/science.299.5605.327a.
5
Ethics. Human health research ethics.伦理。人类健康研究伦理。
Science. 2004 Aug 13;305(5686):949. doi: 10.1126/science.1096862.
6
Research ethics and the EPA.研究伦理与美国环境保护局
Science. 2004 Dec 24;306(5705):2191; author reply 2191. doi: 10.1126/science.306.5705.2191a.
7
Protection for subjects in human research. Final rule.人类研究中受试者的保护。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2006 Feb 6;71(24):6137-76.
8
Agency proposes major expansion of its regulations for human subjects.该机构提议大幅扩充其针对人类受试者的规定。
Hum Res Rep. 2005 Oct;20(10):1-2.
9
Making pragmatism practicable for the institutional review board.让实用主义在机构审查委员会中切实可行。
Am J Bioeth. 2008 Apr;8(4):49-51. doi: 10.1080/15265160802147249.
10
Toxicology. House would foil human pesticide studies.毒理学。豪斯会挫败人体农药研究。
Science. 2005 May 27;308(5726):1234. doi: 10.1126/science.308.5726.1234b.
本文引用的文献
1
Human experimentation: a rule gone awry?人体实验：一项出了差错的规则？
Environ Health Perspect. 2006 Jun;114(6):A360-2. doi: 10.1289/ehp.114-a360.
2
Benefits and risks of pesticide testing on humans.农药人体试验的益处与风险。
Environ Health Perspect. 2005 Dec;113(12):A804-5; author reply A805. doi: 10.1289/ehp.113-1314936.
3
Human testing of pesticides: ethical and scientific considerations.农药人体试验：伦理与科学考量
Am J Public Health. 2004 Nov;94(11):1908-16. doi: 10.2105/ajph.94.11.1908.
4
Pesticide testing in humans: ethics and public policy.人体农药检测：伦理与公共政策
Environ Health Perspect. 2004 Jun;112(8):914-9. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6522.
5
Industry testing of toxic pesticides on human subjects concluded "no effect," despite the evidence.尽管有证据表明有毒杀虫剂对人体有影响，但行业对人体受试者进行的测试却得出了“无影响”的结论。
Environ Health Perspect. 2004 Mar;112(3):A150-1; author reply A151-2; discussion A152-6. doi: 10.1289/ehp.112-1241878.
Zotero 插件