Tong Zhongsheng, Widmer Fred, Sorrell Tania C, Guse Zofia, Jolliffe Katrina A, Halliday Catriona, Lee Ok Cha, Kong Fanrong, Wright Lesley C, Chen Sharon C A
Centre for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology Laboratory, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales 2145, Australia.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007 Jun;51(6):2219-22. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01382-06. Epub 2007 Mar 19.
The susceptibilities of 77 dermatophytes to miltefosine (MI), 1,12-bis(4-pentylpyridinium)dodecane (PYR), 1,12-bis(tributylammonium)dodecane (AM), itraconazole (ITC), terbinafine (TRB), and butenafine (BTF) were compared. Geometric mean MICs of TRB, BTF, ITC, MI, PYR, and AM were 0.039, 0.059, 1.718, 0.671, 6.006, and 4.771 microg/ml, respectively. MI was more active than ITC (P < 0.001).
比较了77种皮肤癣菌对米替福新(MI)、1,12-双(4-戊基吡啶鎓)十二烷(PYR)、1,12-双(三丁基铵)十二烷(AM)、伊曲康唑(ITC)、特比萘芬(TRB)和布替萘芬(BTF)的敏感性。TRB、BTF、ITC、MI、PYR和AM的几何平均MIC分别为0.039、0.059、1.718、0.671、6.006和4.771微克/毫升。MI比ITC更具活性(P<0.001)。