Rusby Julie C, Taylor Ted K, Foster E Michael
Oregon Research Institute.
Psychol Sch. 2007 Mar 16;44(4):333-350. doi: 10.1002/pits.20226.
School discipline referrals (SDRs) may be useful in the early detection and monitoring of disruptive behavior problems to inform prevention efforts in the school setting, yet little is known about the nature and validity of SDRs in the early grades. For this descriptive study, SDR data were collected on a sample of first grade students who were at risk for developing disruptive behavior problems (n = 186) and a universal sample (n = 531) from 20 schools. Most SDRs were given for physical aggression and the predominant consequence was time out. As expected, boys and at-risk students were more likely to receive an SDR and to have more SDRs than were girls and the universal sample. A large difference between schools regarding the delivery of SDRs was found. A zero-inflated Poisson model clustered by school tested the prediction of school-level variables. Students in schools that had a systematic way of tracking SDRs were more likely to receive one. Also, schools with more low-income students and larger class sizes gave fewer SDRs. SDRs predicted teacher ratings, and to a lesser extent, parent ratings of disruptive behavior at the end of first grade. Practitioners and researchers must examine school-level influences whenever first grade discipline referrals are used to measure problem behavior for the purpose of planning and evaluating interventions.
学校纪律转介(SDRs)可能有助于早期发现和监测破坏性行为问题,为学校环境中的预防工作提供信息,但对于低年级SDRs的性质和有效性知之甚少。在这项描述性研究中,收集了来自20所学校的有发展破坏性行为问题风险的一年级学生样本(n = 186)和一个普通样本(n = 531)的SDR数据。大多数SDRs是因身体攻击行为开出的,主要后果是暂停。正如预期的那样,男孩和有风险的学生比女孩和普通样本更有可能收到SDRs且收到的更多。发现学校之间在SDRs发放方面存在很大差异。采用按学校聚类的零膨胀泊松模型来检验学校层面变量的预测情况。有系统跟踪SDRs方法的学校的学生更有可能收到一份SDRs。此外,低收入学生较多且班级规模较大的学校开出的SDRs较少。SDRs可以预测一年级末教师对破坏性行为的评分,在较小程度上也能预测家长的评分。当一年级纪律转介被用于衡量问题行为以规划和评估干预措施时,从业者和研究人员必须审视学校层面的影响因素。