• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

世界卫生组织神经精神病学临床评估量表(泰国版):焦虑症部分的有效性和可靠性。

The validity and reliability of the WHO Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN Thai Version): anxiety disorders section.

作者信息

Krisanaprakornkit Thawatchai, Rangseekajee Poonsri, Paholpak Suchat, Khiewyoo Jiraporn

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.

出版信息

J Med Assoc Thai. 2007 Feb;90(2):341-7.

PMID:17375641
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Anxiety disorders are some of the most prevalent psychiatric disorders, have early onset, are chronic and can cause functional impairment. It is, therefore, crucial to establish an accurate diagnosis for treatment and research purposes.

OBJECTIVE

To test the validity and reliability of the W.H.O. Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN Thai Version): Anxiety Disorders Section.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

The linguistic clarity of the psychiatric schedules for Thais was tested by psychiatrists from the country's four regions. The psychiatrists were competent in the use of the schedules and their underlying objectives. Then between October 2004 and August 2005, Reliability of SCAN: anxiety disorder section was tested among 30 participants, including patients with anxiety disorders and normal volunteers.

RESULTS

Based on reactions from Thais and consultations from competent psychiatrists, content validity was established. The duration of interviews for anxiety disorders section averaged 45.1 min (SD = 13.5). The reliability determined by Cohen's kappa coefficient for the 83 items that related to anxiety disorders in the SCAN were in Section 3, 4, 5. This overall inter-rater reliability was 0.79 (SD = 0.22), which were in substantial level of agreement. The overall intra-rater reliability was rated by the same psychiatrist 2 weeks apart. The result was 0.84 (SD = 0.21), which was near perfect agreement. There were three items (3.6%) of fair agreement and five items (6%) of moderate agreement that were caused from discrepancy of item definitions and the subjectivity of raters.

CONCLUSION

The Anxiety Disorders Sections of the WHO Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN Thai Version) were an effective tool for assessing symptoms of anxiety disorders among Thais.

摘要

背景

焦虑症是最常见的精神疾病之一,起病早,病程慢性,可导致功能障碍。因此,为了治疗和研究目的,准确诊断至关重要。

目的

检验世界卫生组织神经精神病学临床评估日程表(泰国版):焦虑症部分的有效性和可靠性。

材料与方法

泰国四个地区的精神科医生对泰国语精神科日程表的语言清晰度进行了测试。这些精神科医生能够熟练使用日程表及其潜在目标。然后在2004年10月至2005年8月期间,对30名参与者(包括焦虑症患者和正常志愿者)进行了SCAN:焦虑症部分的可靠性测试。

结果

根据泰国人的反应和专业精神科医生的咨询,确定了内容效度。焦虑症部分的访谈时长平均为45.1分钟(标准差 = 13.5)。通过科恩kappa系数确定的与SCAN中焦虑症相关的83个条目的可靠性在第3、4、5节。总体评分者间信度为0.79(标准差 = 0.22),处于高度一致水平。总体评分者内信度由同一位精神科医生在相隔2周时进行评定。结果为0.84(标准差 = 0.21),接近完美一致。由于条目定义的差异和评分者的主观性,有3个条目(3.6%)一致性一般,5个条目(6%)一致性中等。

结论

世界卫生组织神经精神病学临床评估日程表(泰国版)的焦虑症部分是评估泰国人焦虑症症状的有效工具。

相似文献

1
The validity and reliability of the WHO Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN Thai Version): anxiety disorders section.世界卫生组织神经精神病学临床评估量表(泰国版):焦虑症部分的有效性和可靠性。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2007 Feb;90(2):341-7.
2
The validity and reliability of the WHO Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN Thai Version): Mood Disorders Section.世界卫生组织神经精神科临床评估量表(泰国版):情绪障碍部分的效度和信度
J Med Assoc Thai. 2006 Feb;89(2):205-11.
3
Validity and reliability of WHO Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN)-Thai version: Cognitive Impairment or Decline Section.世界卫生组织神经精神病学临床评估日程表(SCAN)泰语版的效度与信度:认知障碍或衰退部分
J Med Assoc Thai. 2008 Jul;91(7):1129-36.
4
Stress and Adjustment Disorder Section of WHO Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN)--Thai version: validity and reliability study.世界卫生组织神经精神病学临床评估日程表(SCAN)中的应激与适应障碍部分——泰语版本:效度与信度研究
J Med Assoc Thai. 2008 Aug;91(8):1263-8.
5
Validity and reliability study of the Thai version of WHO schedules for clinical assessment in neuropsychiatry: sections on psychotic disorders.《世界卫生组织神经精神病学临床评估量表泰国语版的效度和信度研究:精神障碍部分》
J Med Assoc Thai. 2008 Mar;91(3):408-16.
6
Validity and reliability study of the Thai version of WHO Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry version 2.1.《世界卫生组织神经精神病学临床评估日程表》泰语版2.1的效度与信度研究
J Med Assoc Thai. 2010 Apr;93(4):497-501.
7
Validity and reliability study of the Thai version of WHO SCAN: somatoform and dissociative symptoms section.《世界卫生组织复合性国际诊断交谈检查表(WHO SCAN)泰语版:躯体形式障碍和分离症状部分》的效度与信度研究
J Med Assoc Thai. 2006 Apr;89(4):473-83.
8
Validity and reliability study of the Thai version of WHO Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry: Eating Disorders Section.《世界卫生组织神经精神科临床评估量表:饮食失调部分》泰语版的效度与信度研究
J Med Assoc Thai. 2011 Apr;94(4):490-7.
9
Inter- and intra-rater reliability of the Thai version of SCAN: Use of Alcohol and Use of Tobacco Section.泰国版SCAN的评分者间和评分者内信度:酒精使用和烟草使用部分
J Med Assoc Thai. 2006 Dec;89(12):2129-37.
10
[Diagnosis and assessment of anxiety disorders].[焦虑症的诊断与评估]
Praxis (Bern 1994). 1998 May 20;87(21):731-4.