Rothenberg R, Ford E S, Vartiainen E
Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, GA 30333.
J Clin Epidemiol. 1992 Jan;45(1):21-9. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(92)90184-o.
The potential impact of ischemic heart disease intervention programs has usually been assessed using the dichotomy between those programs targeted to high risk groups and those that are population based, but this distinction does not adequately describe the spectrum of possibilities. Using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Epidemiologic Follow-up Study (NHEFS), we assessed the effect of a spectrum of 27 potential interventions on mortality reduction and on an Intervention Index (defined as the number of persons whose risk must change to prevent one death). Using combinations of cholesterol reductions of 20% and decreases in the prevalence of smoking and hypertension of 50%, reductions in mortality varied from 1 to 27% and the Intervention Index varied from 26 to 520. A number of potential interventions were equivalent in their mortality reduction of their Intervention Indexes, despite their affecting differing proportions of the population. The Intervention Index provides some measure of the relative efficiency of programs and points to the comparability of different interventive approaches. In addition, this analysis suggests that the potential impact of intervention programs on mortality will be modest, but that a focus on certain subgroups, such as those aged 40-59 years, can achieve substantial results within those groups, even though the population effect would be minimal.
缺血性心脏病干预项目的潜在影响通常是通过针对高危人群的项目和基于人群的项目之间的二分法来评估的,但这种区分并不能充分描述所有可能的情况。利用国家健康和营养检查调查流行病学随访研究(NHEFS)的数据,我们评估了27种潜在干预措施对降低死亡率和干预指数(定义为风险必须改变以预防一例死亡的人数)的影响。采用胆固醇降低20%、吸烟率和高血压患病率降低50%的组合,死亡率降低幅度从1%到27%不等,干预指数从26到520不等。尽管一些潜在干预措施影响的人群比例不同,但它们在降低死亡率或干预指数方面是等效的。干预指数提供了一些衡量项目相对效率的指标,并指出了不同干预方法的可比性。此外,该分析表明,干预项目对死亡率的潜在影响将是适度的,但关注某些亚组,如40至59岁的人群,即使对总体人群的影响最小,也能在这些亚组中取得显著成效。