• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

缺血性心脏病的预防:评估干预措施的影响。

Ischemic heart disease prevention: estimating the impact of interventions.

作者信息

Rothenberg R, Ford E S, Vartiainen E

机构信息

Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, GA 30333.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 1992 Jan;45(1):21-9. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(92)90184-o.

DOI:10.1016/0895-4356(92)90184-o
PMID:1738008
Abstract

The potential impact of ischemic heart disease intervention programs has usually been assessed using the dichotomy between those programs targeted to high risk groups and those that are population based, but this distinction does not adequately describe the spectrum of possibilities. Using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Epidemiologic Follow-up Study (NHEFS), we assessed the effect of a spectrum of 27 potential interventions on mortality reduction and on an Intervention Index (defined as the number of persons whose risk must change to prevent one death). Using combinations of cholesterol reductions of 20% and decreases in the prevalence of smoking and hypertension of 50%, reductions in mortality varied from 1 to 27% and the Intervention Index varied from 26 to 520. A number of potential interventions were equivalent in their mortality reduction of their Intervention Indexes, despite their affecting differing proportions of the population. The Intervention Index provides some measure of the relative efficiency of programs and points to the comparability of different interventive approaches. In addition, this analysis suggests that the potential impact of intervention programs on mortality will be modest, but that a focus on certain subgroups, such as those aged 40-59 years, can achieve substantial results within those groups, even though the population effect would be minimal.

摘要

缺血性心脏病干预项目的潜在影响通常是通过针对高危人群的项目和基于人群的项目之间的二分法来评估的,但这种区分并不能充分描述所有可能的情况。利用国家健康和营养检查调查流行病学随访研究(NHEFS)的数据,我们评估了27种潜在干预措施对降低死亡率和干预指数(定义为风险必须改变以预防一例死亡的人数)的影响。采用胆固醇降低20%、吸烟率和高血压患病率降低50%的组合,死亡率降低幅度从1%到27%不等,干预指数从26到520不等。尽管一些潜在干预措施影响的人群比例不同,但它们在降低死亡率或干预指数方面是等效的。干预指数提供了一些衡量项目相对效率的指标,并指出了不同干预方法的可比性。此外,该分析表明,干预项目对死亡率的潜在影响将是适度的,但关注某些亚组,如40至59岁的人群,即使对总体人群的影响最小,也能在这些亚组中取得显著成效。

相似文献

1
Ischemic heart disease prevention: estimating the impact of interventions.缺血性心脏病的预防:评估干预措施的影响。
J Clin Epidemiol. 1992 Jan;45(1):21-9. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(92)90184-o.
2
[Effectiveness of the cooperative program of multifactorial prevention of ischemic heart disease (results of the 3-year study)].[缺血性心脏病多因素预防合作项目的成效(3年研究结果)]
Kardiologiia. 1990 Apr;30(4):95-8.
3
Modifiable cardiac risk factors of smoking, elevated serum cholesterol and hypertension: a community survey.可改变的心脏危险因素——吸烟、血清胆固醇升高和高血压:一项社区调查。
Can J Public Health. 1992 Nov-Dec;83(6):437-40.
4
Would achieving healthy people 2010's targets reduce both population levels and social disparities in heart disease?实现《2010年美国人健康目标》中的各项指标能否降低心脏病的总体发病率及社会差异?
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009 Nov;2(6):598-606. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.109.884601. Epub 2009 Aug 25.
5
Comparing primary prevention with secondary prevention to explain decreasing coronary heart disease death rates in Ireland, 1985-2000.比较一级预防和二级预防以解释1985 - 2000年爱尔兰冠心病死亡率下降的原因。
BMC Public Health. 2007 Jun 21;7:117. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-117.
6
Coronary artery disease risk factors in the Johns Hopkins Lupus Cohort: prevalence, recognition by patients, and preventive practices.约翰霍普金斯狼疮队列中的冠状动脉疾病风险因素:患病率、患者认知度及预防措施
Medicine (Baltimore). 1992 Sep;71(5):291-302. doi: 10.1097/00005792-199209000-00004.
7
[Cholesterolemia control in Spain, 2000. A tool for cardiovascular disease prevention. Ministry of Health and Consumption, Spanish Society of Cardiology and Spanish Society of Arteriosclerosis].[2000年西班牙的胆固醇血症控制。心血管疾病预防工具。卫生与消费部、西班牙心脏病学会和西班牙动脉硬化学会]
Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2000 May-Jun;74(3):215-53.
8
Epidemiology and public policy.流行病学与公共政策。
Am J Epidemiol. 1991 Nov 15;134(10):1057-61. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116007.
9
Preventing heart disease: is treating the high risk sufficient?预防心脏病:治疗高危人群是否足够?
J Clin Epidemiol. 1988;41(11):1083-93. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(88)90078-9.
10
[Possibilities and strategies for prevention of ischemic heart disease. Risk factors, trials, mass and individual strategies].[缺血性心脏病的预防可能性与策略。危险因素、试验、群体及个体策略]
G Ital Cardiol. 1989 Sep;19(9):770-7; discussion 778-86.

引用本文的文献

1
Quantifying the expected vs potential impact of a risk-factor intervention program.量化风险因素干预计划的预期影响与潜在影响。
Am J Public Health. 1997 May;87(5):867-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.87.5.867.
2
How can we best prolong life? Benefits of coronary risk factor reduction in non-diabetic and diabetic subjects.我们如何才能最好地延长寿命?非糖尿病和糖尿病患者降低冠状动脉危险因素的益处。
BMJ. 1993 May 15;306(6888):1313-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6888.1313.
3
Determining success in the cholesterol crusade.确定胆固醇防治行动的成效。
CMAJ. 1992 Jun 15;146(12):2196.