Kabir Zubair, Bennett Kathleen, Shelley Emer, Unal Belgin, Critchley Julia A, Capewell Simon
Harvard School of Public Health, Division of Public Health Practice, Boston, USA.
BMC Public Health. 2007 Jun 21;7:117. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-117.
To investigate whether primary prevention might be more favourable than secondary prevention (risk factor reduction in patients with coronary heart disease(CHD)).
The cell-based IMPACT CHD mortality model was used to integrate data for Ireland describing CHD patient numbers, uptake of specific treatments, trends in major cardiovascular risk factors, and the mortality benefits of these specific risk factor changes in CHD patients and in healthy people without recognised CHD.
Between 1985 and 2000, approximately 2,530 fewer deaths were attributable to reductions in the three major risk factors in Ireland. Overall smoking prevalence declined by 14% between 1985 and 2000, resulting in about 685 fewer deaths (minimum estimate 330, maximum estimate 1,285) attributable to smoking cessation: about 275 in healthy people and 410 in known CHD patients. Population total cholesterol concentrations fell by 4.6%, resulting in approximately 1,300 (minimum estimate 1,115, maximum estimate 1,660) fewer deaths attributable to dietary changes(1,185 in healthy people and 115 in CHD patients) plus 305 fewer deaths attributable to statin treatment (45 in people without CHD and 260 in CHD patients). Mean population diastolic blood pressure fell by 7.2%, resulting in approximately 170 (minimum estimate 105, maximum estimate 300) fewer deaths attributable to secular falls in blood pressure (140 in healthy people and 30 in CHD patients), plus approximately 70 fewer deaths attributable to antihypertensive treatments in people without CHD. Of all the deaths attributable to risk factor falls, some 1,715 (68%) occurred in people without recognized CHD and 815(32%) in CHD patients.
Compared with secondary prevention, primary prevention achieved a two-fold larger reduction in CHD deaths. Future national CHD policies should therefore prioritize nationwide interventions to promote healthy diets and reduce smoking.
探讨一级预防是否可能比二级预防(降低冠心病(CHD)患者的危险因素)更具优势。
基于细胞的IMPACT CHD死亡率模型用于整合爱尔兰的数据,这些数据描述了冠心病患者数量、特定治疗的采用情况、主要心血管危险因素的趋势,以及这些特定危险因素变化对冠心病患者和无冠心病的健康人群死亡率的益处。
1985年至2000年间,爱尔兰因三大危险因素降低而导致的死亡人数减少了约2530人。1985年至2000年间,总体吸烟率下降了14%,因戒烟导致的死亡人数减少了约685人(最低估计330人,最高估计1285人):健康人群中约275人,已知冠心病患者中约410人。人群总胆固醇浓度下降了4.6%,因饮食变化导致的死亡人数减少了约1300人(最低估计1115人,最高估计1660人)(健康人群中1185人,冠心病患者中115人),加上他汀类药物治疗导致的死亡人数减少了305人(无冠心病者中45人,冠心病患者中260人)。人群平均舒张压下降了7.2%,因血压长期下降导致的死亡人数减少了约170人(最低估计105人,最高估计300人)(健康人群中140人,冠心病患者中30人),加上无冠心病者因抗高血压治疗导致的死亡人数减少了约70人。在所有因危险因素下降导致的死亡中,约1715人(68%)发生在无冠心病的人群中,815人(32%)发生在冠心病患者中。
与二级预防相比,一级预防使冠心病死亡人数减少了两倍。因此,未来国家冠心病政策应优先在全国范围内进行干预,以促进健康饮食和减少吸烟。