Burkemper Jill E, DuBois James M, Lavin Mary Ann, Meyer Geralyn A, McSweeney Maryellen
Center for Health Care Ethics, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Nurs Educ Perspect. 2007 Jan-Feb;28(1):10-7.
The aim of this study was to determine the manner in which master's of science in nursing programs, accredited by either the National League for Nursing Accrediting Commission or the Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education, conduct ethics education. A survey method was employed to obtain requisite data. Among the main variables investigated were: the percentage of programs that require a course with formal ethics content; the average number of class hours a program or track dedicates to ethics education; required and actual credentials of instructors who teach ethics; and objectives, topics, teaching methods, and grading methods of required courses with formal ethics content. Results indicated that most programs do not require instructors to have completed formal ethics training. In terms of content, few common trends exist and there are important gaps in clinical ethics topics. Comparisons between school of medicine ethics content reported in the literature and MSN ethics content reported in this study indicate that medical schools are more exacting of their students. The study concludes with a call for the establishment of guidelines or standards relevant to ethics content in MSN curricula in the United States.
本研究的目的是确定由美国国家护理联盟认证委员会或学院护理教育委员会认证的护理学硕士项目开展伦理教育的方式。采用调查方法获取所需数据。调查的主要变量包括:要求开设具有正式伦理内容课程的项目所占百分比;一个项目或方向用于伦理教育的平均课时数;讲授伦理课程的教师所需及实际具备的资质;以及具有正式伦理内容的必修课程的目标、主题、教学方法和评分方法。结果表明,大多数项目不要求教师完成正式的伦理培训。在内容方面,几乎没有共同趋势,临床伦理主题存在重要空白。文献中报道的医学院伦理内容与本研究中报道的护理学硕士伦理内容的比较表明,医学院对其学生要求更为严格。该研究最后呼吁制定与美国护理学硕士课程伦理内容相关的指导方针或标准。