Suppr超能文献

无创二氧化碳监测的准确性:两种经皮系统的临床评估

The accuracy of non-invasive carbon dioxide monitoring: a clinical evaluation of two transcutaneous systems.

作者信息

Bolliger D, Steiner L A, Kasper J, Aziz O A, Filipovic M, Seeberger M D

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, University of Basel Hospital, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

Anaesthesia. 2007 Apr;62(4):394-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.04987.x.

Abstract

We determined the accuracy of two transcutaneous carbon dioxide monitoring systems (SenTec Digital Monitor with V-Sign Sensor and TOSCA 500 with TOSCA Sensor 92) for the measurement of single values and trends in the arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide in 122 adult patients during major surgery and in 50 adult patients in the intensive care unit. One or several paired measurements were performed in each patient. The first measurement was used to determine the accuracy of a single value of transcutaneous carbon dioxide; the difference between the first and the last measurements was used to analyse the accuracy and to track trends. We defined a 95% limit of agreement of <or=1 kPa as being clinically useful. There was insufficient agreement between transcutaneous carbon dioxide partial pressure values derived from the two systems and arterial carbon dioxide values for both single values and trends as defined by our suggested limit of agreement. We conclude that these systems cannot replace conventional blood gas analysis in the clinical setting studied.

摘要

我们测定了两种经皮二氧化碳监测系统(配备V型传感器的森泰克数字监测仪和配备TOSCA传感器92的TOSCA 500)在122例接受大手术的成年患者以及50例重症监护病房成年患者中测量二氧化碳动脉分压单值和趋势的准确性。对每位患者进行了一次或几次配对测量。第一次测量用于确定经皮二氧化碳单值的准确性;第一次和最后一次测量之间的差值用于分析准确性并追踪趋势。我们将临床有用的95%一致性界限定义为≤1 kPa。根据我们建议的一致性界限,两种系统得出的经皮二氧化碳分压值与动脉二氧化碳值在单值和趋势方面的一致性均不足。我们得出结论,在所研究的临床环境中,这些系统无法替代传统的血气分析。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验