Oser Carrie B, Tindall Michele Staton, Leukefeld Carl G
Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, Department of Sociology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2007 Apr;32(3):301-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2006.12.016. Epub 2007 Mar 9.
This study compares the provision of HIV testing in a nationally representative sample of correctional agencies and community-based substance abuse treatment programs and identifies the internal organizational-level correlates of HIV testing in both organizations. Data are derived from the Criminal Justice Drug Abuse Treatment Studies' National Criminal Justice Treatment Practices Survey. Using an organizational diffusion theoretical framework [Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: The Free Press], the impact of Centralization of Power, Complexity, Formalization, Interconnectedness, Organizational Resources, and Organizational Size on HIV testing was examined in correctional agencies and treatment programs. Although there were no significant differences in the provision of HIV testing among correctional agencies (49%) and treatment programs (50%), the internal organizational-level correlates were more predictive of HIV testing in correctional agencies. Specifically, all dimensions, with the exception of Formalization, were related to the provision of HIV testing in correctional agencies. Implications for correctional agencies and community treatment to adopt HIV testing are discussed.
本研究比较了在具有全国代表性的惩教机构样本和社区药物滥用治疗项目中提供艾滋病毒检测的情况，并确定了这两类组织中艾滋病毒检测在组织内部层面的相关因素。数据来自刑事司法药物滥用治疗研究的全国刑事司法治疗实践调查。运用组织传播理论框架[罗杰斯，E.M.（2003年）。《创新的传播》（第5版）。纽约：自由出版社]，研究了权力集中化、复杂性、形式化、相互联系、组织资源和组织规模对惩教机构和治疗项目中艾滋病毒检测的影响。尽管惩教机构（49%）和治疗项目（50%）在提供艾滋病毒检测方面没有显著差异，但组织内部层面的相关因素对惩教机构中艾滋病毒检测的预测性更强。具体而言，除形式化外，所有维度均与惩教机构中艾滋病毒检测的提供有关。文中还讨论了惩教机构和社区治疗采用艾滋病毒检测的意义。
