Vimont A, Vernozy-Rozand C, Montet M P, Bavai C, Fremaux B, Delignette-Muller M-L
Unité de Microbiologie Alimentaire et Prévisionnelle, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de Lyon, BP 83, 1 Avenue Bourgelat, 69280 Marcy l'Etoile, France.
Vet Microbiol. 2007 Jul 20;123(1-3):274-81. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.02.003. Epub 2007 Feb 9.
Cattle are an important reservoir for STEC and eating food contaminated with fecal material is a frequent source of human STEC infection. It is thus essential to reliably determine the prevalence of STEC contamination in cattle. Currently, different enrichment protocols are used before the detection of Shiga-Toxin producing Escherichia coli (STEC) in fecal samples. However, there have not been any studies performed that have compared the effectiveness of these various enrichment protocols for the growth of non-O157 STEC in fecal samples. The objective of this present study was to characterize the effects of different enrichment factors on the simultaneous growth of the feces background microflora (BM) and two non-O157 STEC strains. The different factors studied were the basal medium (TSB and EC), the effect of novobiocin in the broth (N+ or N-) and the incubation temperature (37 or 40 degrees C). The BM and STEC growth data were simultaneously fitted by using a competitive growth model. The STEC final levels obtained after 24h were higher for the protocols with novobiocin and/or EC compared to the others. However, novobiocin inhibited the growth of one STEC strain. We observed that the addition of novobiocin into broths is not advisable for optimal growth conditions. Moreover, given high BM and low STEC levels often observed in feces, predictions made with the growth model highlighted that false negative results could more likely appear with protocols using TSB without novobiocin than with protocols using EC. In conclusion, the use of EC broth in enrichment protocols seems to be more appropriate for detecting non-O157 STEC from bovine fecal samples. This can help avoid false negative results that cause an underestimation of the STEC prevalence in cattle.
牛是产志贺毒素大肠杆菌(STEC)的重要宿主,食用被粪便污染的食物是人类感染STEC的常见来源。因此,可靠地确定牛群中STEC污染的流行情况至关重要。目前,在检测粪便样本中的产志贺毒素大肠杆菌(STEC)之前,使用了不同的富集方案。然而,尚未有任何研究比较这些不同富集方案对粪便样本中非O157 STEC生长的有效性。本研究的目的是表征不同富集因素对粪便背景微生物群(BM)和两种非O157 STEC菌株同时生长的影响。所研究的不同因素包括基础培养基(胰蛋白胨大豆肉汤和肠球菌培养基)、肉汤中新生霉素的作用(添加或不添加)以及培养温度(37或40摄氏度)。通过使用竞争生长模型同时拟合BM和STEC的生长数据。与其他方案相比,添加新生霉素和/或肠球菌培养基的方案在24小时后获得的STEC最终水平更高。然而,新生霉素抑制了一种STEC菌株的生长。我们观察到,在肉汤中添加新生霉素对于最佳生长条件并不可取。此外,鉴于粪便中经常观察到高BM和低STEC水平,生长模型的预测突出表明,与使用肠球菌培养基的方案相比,使用不含新生霉素的胰蛋白胨大豆肉汤的方案更可能出现假阴性结果。总之,在富集方案中使用肠球菌培养基似乎更适合从牛粪便样本中检测非O157 STEC。这有助于避免因假阴性结果导致低估牛群中STEC的流行情况。