Adhikari Neill K J, Burns Karen E A, Friedrich Jan O, Granton John T, Cook Deborah J, Meade Maureen O
Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
BMJ. 2007 Apr 14;334(7597):779. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39139.716794.55. Epub 2007 Mar 23.
To review the literature on the use of inhaled nitric oxide to treat acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ALI/ARDS) and to summarise the effects of nitric oxide, compared with placebo or usual care without nitric oxide, in adults and children with ALI or ARDS.
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Medline, CINAHL, Embase, and CENTRAL (to October 2006), proceedings from four conferences, and additional information from authors of 10 trials.
Two reviewers independently selected parallel group randomised controlled trials comparing nitric oxide with control and extracted data related to study methods, clinical and physiological outcomes, and adverse events.
Mortality, duration of ventilation, oxygenation, pulmonary arterial pressure, adverse events.
12 trials randomly assigning 1237 patients met inclusion criteria. Overall methodological quality was good. Using random effects models, we found no significant effect of nitric oxide on hospital mortality (risk ratio 1.10, 95% confidence interval 0.94 to 1.30), duration of ventilation, or ventilator-free days. On day one of treatment, nitric oxide increased the ratio of partial pressure of oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2 ratio) (13%, 4% to 23%) and decreased the oxygenation index (14%, 2% to 25%). Some evidence suggested that improvements in oxygenation persisted until day four. There was no effect on mean pulmonary arterial pressure. Patients receiving nitric oxide had an increased risk of developing renal dysfunction (1.50, 1.11 to 2.02).
Nitric oxide is associated with limited improvement in oxygenation in patients with ALI or ARDS but confers no mortality benefit and may cause harm. We do not recommend its routine use in these severely ill patients.
回顾关于吸入一氧化氮治疗急性肺损伤/急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ALI/ARDS)的文献,并总结一氧化氮与安慰剂或无一氧化氮的常规治疗相比,对成人和儿童ALI或ARDS患者的疗效。
系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medline、CINAHL、Embase和CENTRAL(至2006年10月)、四个会议的论文集以及10项试验作者提供的额外信息。
两名综述员独立选择将一氧化氮与对照组进行比较的平行组随机对照试验,并提取与研究方法、临床和生理结果以及不良事件相关的数据。
死亡率、通气时间、氧合、肺动脉压、不良事件。
12项随机分配1237例患者的试验符合纳入标准。总体方法学质量良好。使用随机效应模型,我们发现一氧化氮对医院死亡率(风险比1.10,95%置信区间0.94至1.30)、通气时间或无呼吸机天数无显著影响。在治疗第1天,一氧化氮提高了氧分压与吸入氧分数的比值(PaO2/FiO2比值)(13%,4%至23%)并降低了氧合指数(14%,2%至25%)。一些证据表明氧合改善持续到第4天。对平均肺动脉压无影响。接受一氧化氮治疗的患者发生肾功能障碍的风险增加(1.50,1.11至2.02)。
一氧化氮与ALI或ARDS患者氧合的有限改善相关,但无死亡率获益,且可能造成伤害。我们不建议在这些重症患者中常规使用。