Suppr超能文献

一项关于冠状动脉搭桥手术中消除体外循环效果的倾向评分分析。

A propensity score analysis on the effect of eliminating cardiopulmonary bypass for coronary artery bypass grafting.

作者信息

Crescenzi G, Landoni G, Romano A, Boroli F, Giardina G, Bignami E, Fochi O, Aletti G, Rosica C, Zangrillo A

机构信息

Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Istituto San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Minerva Anestesiol. 2007 Mar;73(3):135-41.

Abstract

AIM

The aim of the study was to investigate if the off-pump technique could reduce the hospital mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting when compared to the standard cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) technique.

METHODS

An observational study with propensity score matching analysis was performed in a university teaching hospital in 2,899 consecutive patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting. No intervention was performed. Major perioperative complications and hospital mortality were noted.

RESULTS

The overall hospital mortality was 1.3% (39/2,899) with no difference between the off-pump (16/802, 2.0%) and the CPB group (23/2,097, 1.1%) P=0.09. Since the off-pump group included patients at high risk, a propensity score analysis was then performed and off-pump patients matched 1:1 to CPB patients in order to have the same preoperative variables identified by a multivariate analysis as associated to surgeon propensity to operate off-pump: (age, chronic renal failure and low ejection fraction) and the same number of graft performed. The results of the propensity matching still showed no difference in hospital mortality between off-pump and CPB group (1.6% vs 1.1% P=0.6). The off-pump technique showed advantages in terms of transfusion of blood products (P<0.001) and reduction of surgical re-exploration (P=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

No difference in hospital mortality in coronary artery bypass grafting patients could be observed between patients operated off-pump or with the standard CPB technique.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨与标准体外循环(CPB)技术相比,非体外循环技术能否降低冠状动脉旁路移植术后的医院死亡率。

方法

在一所大学教学医院对2899例连续接受择期冠状动脉旁路移植术的患者进行了一项倾向评分匹配分析的观察性研究。未进行干预。记录主要围手术期并发症和医院死亡率。

结果

总体医院死亡率为1.3%(39/2899),非体外循环组(16/802,2.0%)和CPB组(23/2097,1.1%)之间无差异,P = 0.09。由于非体外循环组包括高危患者,则进行倾向评分分析,并将非体外循环患者与CPB患者1:1匹配,以使多变量分析确定的与外科医生非体外循环手术倾向相关的术前变量(年龄、慢性肾功能衰竭和低射血分数)相同,且移植数量相同。倾向匹配结果仍显示非体外循环组和CPB组在医院死亡率上无差异(1.6%对1.1%,P = 0.6)。非体外循环技术在血液制品输注方面(P<0.001)和减少再次手术探查方面(P = 0.04)显示出优势。

结论

在冠状动脉旁路移植术患者中,非体外循环手术患者与采用标准CPB技术的患者在医院死亡率上无差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验