• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对不同年龄组(年轻组和老年组)的《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)人格障碍标准的项目反应理论分析。

An item response theory analysis of DSM-IV personality disorder criteria across younger and older age groups.

作者信息

Balsis Steve, Gleason Marci E J, Woods Carol M, Oltmanns Thomas F

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Washington University, St Louis, MO 63130-4899, USA.

出版信息

Psychol Aging. 2007 Mar;22(1):171-85. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.22.1.171.

DOI:10.1037/0882-7974.22.1.171
PMID:17385993
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4370294/
Abstract

Many of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition (DSM-IV; American Psychiatric Association, 1994) personality disorder (PD) diagnostic criteria focus on a younger social and occupational context. The absence of age-appropriate criteria for older adults forces researchers and clinicians to draw conclusions based on existing criteria, which are likely inadequate. To explore which DSM-IV PD criteria contain age group measurement bias, the authors report 2 analyses of data on nearly 37,000 participants, ages 18-98 years, taken from a public data set that includes 7 of the 10 PDs (antisocial, avoidant, dependent, histrionic, obsessive-compulsive, paranoid, and schizoid). The 1st analysis revealed that older age groups tend to endorse fewer PD criteria than younger age groups. The 2nd analysis revealed that 29% of the criteria contain measurement bias. Although the latent variable structure for each PD was quite similar across younger and older age groups, some individual criteria were differentially endorsed by younger and older adults with equivalent PD pathology. The presence of measurement bias for these criteria raises questions concerning the assessment of PDs in older adults and the interpretation of existing data.

摘要

《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第4版(DSM-IV;美国精神病学协会,1994年)中的许多人格障碍(PD)诊断标准都侧重于较年轻人群的社交和职业背景。由于缺乏针对老年人的适合其年龄阶段的标准,研究人员和临床医生不得不依据现有标准得出结论,而这些标准可能并不充分。为探究哪些DSM-IV PD标准存在年龄组测量偏差,作者报告了对近37000名年龄在18至98岁参与者的数据进行的两项分析,这些数据取自一个公共数据集,该数据集涵盖了10种人格障碍中的7种(反社会型、回避型、依赖型、表演型、强迫型、偏执型和分裂样人格障碍)。第一项分析表明,年龄较大的年龄组往往比年龄较小的年龄组认可的PD标准更少。第二项分析表明,29%的标准存在测量偏差。尽管每个PD的潜在变量结构在年龄较小和较大的年龄组中非常相似,但一些个体标准在具有同等PD病理特征的年轻和年长成年人中得到了不同程度的认可。这些标准存在测量偏差这一情况引发了有关老年人PD评估以及现有数据解读的问题。

相似文献

1
An item response theory analysis of DSM-IV personality disorder criteria across younger and older age groups.针对不同年龄组(年轻组和老年组)的《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)人格障碍标准的项目反应理论分析。
Psychol Aging. 2007 Mar;22(1):171-85. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.22.1.171.
2
Overdiagnosis and underdiagnosis of personality disorders in older adults.老年人中人格障碍的过度诊断和诊断不足
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2007 Sep;15(9):742-53. doi: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e31813c6b4e.
3
Gender bias in diagnostic criteria for personality disorders: an item response theory analysis.人格障碍诊断标准中的性别偏见:一项项目反应理论分析。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2007 Feb;116(1):166-75. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.116.1.166.
4
[Personality disorders in a nonclinical sample of adolescents].[青少年非临床样本中的人格障碍]
Encephale. 2002 Nov-Dec;28(6 Pt 1):520-4.
5
The structure of genetic and environmental risk factors for DSM-IV personality disorders: a multivariate twin study.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版人格障碍的遗传和环境风险因素结构:一项多变量双胞胎研究
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2008 Dec;65(12):1438-46. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.65.12.1438.
6
The fundamental structure of axis II personality disorders assessed in the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions.在《酒精及相关疾病国家流行病学调查》中评估的轴II人格障碍的基本结构。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2007 Dec;68(12):1913-20. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v68n1212.
7
Validation of the FFM PD count technique for screening personality pathology in later middle-aged and older adults.验证 FFM PD 计数技术在中老年人群中筛查人格病理学的应用。
Aging Ment Health. 2013;17(2):180-8. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2012.717258. Epub 2012 Aug 22.
8
Personality pathology and alcohol dependence at midlife in a community sample.中年人群体样本中的人格病理学与酒精依赖。
Personal Disord. 2013 Jan;4(1):55-61. doi: 10.1037/a0030224. Epub 2012 Dec 10.
9
Two-year prevalence and stability of individual DSM-IV criteria for schizotypal, borderline, avoidant, and obsessive-compulsive personality disorders: toward a hybrid model of axis II disorders.分裂型、边缘型、回避型及强迫型人格障碍的个体DSM-IV标准的两年患病率及稳定性:迈向轴II障碍的混合模型
Am J Psychiatry. 2005 May;162(5):883-9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.5.883.
10
The Spanish-Language Version of the Diagnostic Interview for DSM-IV personality disorders: development and initial psychometric evaluation of diagnoses and criteria.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第四版》人格障碍诊断访谈的西班牙语版本:诊断与标准的编制及初步心理测量评估
Compr Psychiatry. 2003 Mar-Apr;44(2):154-61. doi: 10.1053/comp.2003.50006.

引用本文的文献

1
New horizons in personality disorders-from neglect to necessity in geriatric care.人格障碍的新视野——从老年护理中的忽视到必需
Age Ageing. 2025 Mar 28;54(4). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaf066.
2
Personality assessment in nursing home residents with mental and physical multimorbidity: two informant perspectives.患有精神和身体多种疾病的养老院居民的人格评估:两种信息提供者视角
Int Psychogeriatr. 2024 Dec;36(12):1219-1231. doi: 10.1017/S1041610224000474. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
3
Reliability coefficients for multiple group item response theory models.多群组项目反应理论模型的可靠性系数。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2022 May;75(2):395-410. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12269. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
4
Impact of borderline personality disorder traits on the association between age and health-related quality of life: A cohort study in the general population.边缘型人格特质对年龄与健康相关生活质量之间关联的影响:一项普通人群的队列研究。
Eur Psychiatry. 2021 Apr 26;64(1):e33. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2021.27.
5
Reliability of Differential Item Functioning in Alcohol Use Disorder: Bayesian Meta-Analysis of Criteria Discrimination Estimates.酒精使用障碍中鉴别项目功能差异的可靠性:标准判别估计的贝叶斯荟萃分析。
Assessment. 2022 Jul;29(5):925-939. doi: 10.1177/1073191120986613. Epub 2021 Feb 20.
6
Personality disorders and intimate partner aggression: A replication and extension in older, married couples.人格障碍与亲密伴侣暴力:老年已婚夫妇中的再研究与扩展。
Personal Disord. 2021 Jan;12(1):70-80. doi: 10.1037/per0000458. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
7
Using Complete Enumeration to Derive "One-Size-Fits-All" Versus "Subgroup-Specific" Diagnostic Rules for Substance Use Disorder.使用完全枚举法推导物质使用障碍的“一刀切”与“特定亚组”诊断规则。
Assessment. 2020 Sep;27(6):1075-1088. doi: 10.1177/1073191120903092. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
8
Personality Disorders in Older Adults: a Review of Epidemiology, Assessment, and Treatment.老年人人格障碍:流行病学、评估和治疗的综述。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2020 Feb 6;22(3):14. doi: 10.1007/s11920-020-1133-x.
9
Effects of Skip-Logic on the Validity of Dimensional Clinical Scores: A Simulation Study.跳级逻辑对维度临床评分有效性的影响:一项模拟研究。
Psychopathology. 2019;52(6):358-366. doi: 10.1159/000505075. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
10
Symptom-level analysis of DSM-IV/DSM-5 personality pathology in later life: Hierarchical structure and predictive validity across self- and informant ratings.晚年 DSM-IV/DSM-5 人格病理学的症状水平分析:自我和知情者评定的层次结构和预测效度。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2019 Jul;128(5):365-384. doi: 10.1037/abn0000444.

本文引用的文献

1
Hierarchical linear modeling analyses of the NEO-PI-R scales in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging.巴尔的摩纵向衰老研究中NEO-PI-R量表的分层线性模型分析。
Psychol Aging. 2005 Sep;20(3):493-506. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.20.3.493.
2
Cross-sectional age differences in personality among medicare patients aged 65 to 100.65至100岁医疗保险患者的人格横断面年龄差异。
Psychol Aging. 2005 Mar;20(1):182-5. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.20.1.182.
3
Personality change precedes clinical diagnosis of dementia of the Alzheimer type.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2005 Mar;60(2):P98-P101. doi: 10.1093/geronb/60.2.p98.
4
Co-occurrence of DSM-IV personality disorders in the United States: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions.美国《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版人格障碍的共病情况:来自酒精及相关疾病国家流行病学调查的结果
Compr Psychiatry. 2005 Jan-Feb;46(1):1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2004.07.019.
5
Socioemotional selectivity theory, aging, and health: the increasingly delicate balance between regulating emotions and making tough choices.社会情感选择理论、衰老与健康:调节情绪与做出艰难抉择之间日益微妙的平衡。
J Pers. 2004 Dec;72(6):1395-424. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2004.00301.x.
6
Two-year stability and change of schizotypal, borderline, avoidant, and obsessive-compulsive personality disorders.分裂型、边缘型、回避型和强迫型人格障碍的两年稳定性与变化
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004 Oct;72(5):767-75. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.72.5.767.
7
Individual growth curve analysis illuminates stability and change in personality disorder features: the longitudinal study of personality disorders.个体成长曲线分析揭示人格障碍特征的稳定性与变化:人格障碍的纵向研究
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2004 Oct;61(10):1015-24. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.61.10.1015.
8
The longitudinal relationship of personality traits and disorders.人格特质与障碍的纵向关系。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2004 May;113(2):217-27. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.113.2.217.
9
Toward an integrative science of the person.迈向关于人的综合科学。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2004;55:1-22. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.042902.130709.
10
Personality disorders over time: precursors, course and outcome.人格障碍的长期演变:先兆、病程及转归
J Pers Disord. 2003 Dec;17(6):479-88. doi: 10.1521/pedi.17.6.479.25360.