Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis.
Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University.
J Abnorm Psychol. 2019 Jul;128(5):365-384. doi: 10.1037/abn0000444.
Dissatisfaction with the categorical model of personality disorder led to several investigations on alternative, dimensional systems. The majority of these studies were conducted at the syndrome-level where each diagnostic criterion is summed or averaged within each disorder. Studies at the symptom-level have identified symptom dimensions that define and cut across categories, but the number and nature of dimensions varies across studies. The purpose of the present study was to examine the hierarchical structure and impact of personality pathology at the symptom-level across self- and informant ratings in a large community sample of older adults (N = 1,630; ages 55 to 64). Results indicated that multiple structural patterns can be organized within a common hierarchical framework, with a general factor of maladjustment at the top, 2 broad dimensions of internalizing and externalizing pathology directly below, and progressively more specific symptom dimensions toward the bottom. Factors at each level of the hierarchy were similar across self- and informant ratings. The 4-factor model showed significant incremental validity in predicting a range of life outcomes over simpler models, while increasingly complex models incrementally but modestly improved predictive power. Several consistencies emerged between the current findings and prior factor analytic studies. The most unexpected result was the conspicuous absence of a disinhibition factor reflecting antisocial and impulsivity-related problems. This anomaly may involve the older age of our sample and the changing expression of personality pathology in later life. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
对人格障碍的分类模型的不满导致了对替代的、维度的系统的几项调查。这些研究大多是在综合征水平上进行的,在每个障碍中,每个诊断标准都被相加或平均。在症状水平上的研究已经确定了定义和跨越类别界限的症状维度,但维度的数量和性质因研究而异。本研究的目的是在一个大型社区样本的老年人群体中(N=1630;年龄在 55 岁至 64 岁之间),检查自我报告和知情者报告的人格病理学在症状水平上的层次结构和影响。结果表明,在共同的层次结构框架内,可以组织多种结构模式,以适应不良为总体因素,位于其下的是两个广泛的内化和外化病理维度,再往下是更具体的症状维度。每个层次的因素在自我和知情者评分中是相似的。在预测一系列生活结果方面,四因素模型比简单模型具有显著的增量有效性,而越来越复杂的模型则适度地提高了预测能力。当前的发现与先前的因素分析研究之间存在一些一致性。最出人意料的结果是,明显缺乏反映反社会和冲动相关问题的抑制解除因素。这种异常可能涉及到我们样本的年龄较大,以及人格病理学在晚年的变化表达。(心理学信息数据库记录(c)2019APA,保留所有权利)。