Haseen Farhana
Research and Evaluation Division (RED), BRAC, BRAC Centre, 75 Mohakhali, Dhaka-1212, Bangladesh.
Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2007;16 Suppl 1:58-64.
Poverty persists at an alarming level in Bangladesh. To reduce extreme poverty and create the foundation for a sustainable livelihood change, BRAC undertook a targeted programme since 2002 named, Challenging the Frontiers of Poverty Reduction/Targeting the Ultra Poor (CFPR/TUP).
To investigate the impact of the CFPR/TUP programme on food and energy consumption.
Two cross sectional surveys on food consumption were conducted, a pre-intervention survey in 2002 and a post-intervention survey in 2004 covering 180 intervention and 193 non-intervention households. Three days' recall method was administrated in both the survey rounds.
The baseline food consumption survey showed an inadequate food intake in all households, which did not differ between the two groups. At post-intervention, the quality and quantity of food intake improved significantly in the intervention households as compared to baseline. In this group, the consumption of various food items such as rice, pulse, vegetables, fish, fruit, milk and egg showed significant improvement (p<0.001), particularly, the level of fish consumption doubled in intervention households while in control households it remained almost unchanged (14 g/day to 27 g/day for intervention vs. 11 g/day to 13 g/day for control). Energy intake increased from 1750+/-650 Kcal/day to 2138+/-704 Kcal/day in intervention households (p<0.001), whereas no significant change was observed in control households. Percentages of energy from cereals decreased from 85% to 78% in intervention households (p<0.001) while it remained unchanged in control households.
CFPR/TUP programme seems to have direct impact on ultra poor family's ability to significantly increase consumption of food and energy.
孟加拉国的贫困现象持续存在,且程度令人担忧。为减少极端贫困并为可持续生计变革奠定基础,自2002年起,孟加拉农村发展委员会(BRAC)开展了一项名为“挑战减贫前沿/瞄准极端贫困人口”(CFPR/TUP)的针对性项目。
调查CFPR/TUP项目对食物和能源消费的影响。
进行了两次关于食物消费的横断面调查,一次是2002年的干预前调查,另一次是2004年的干预后调查,涵盖180户干预家庭和193户非干预家庭。两轮调查均采用三日回顾法。
基线食物消费调查显示,所有家庭的食物摄入量均不足,两组之间无差异。干预后,与基线相比,干预家庭的食物摄入量在质量和数量上均有显著改善。在这一组中,大米、豆类、蔬菜、鱼、水果、牛奶和鸡蛋等各类食物的消费量有显著提高(p<0.001),特别是干预家庭的鱼类消费量翻了一番,而对照家庭几乎没有变化(干预家庭从每天14克增至27克,对照家庭从每天11克增至13克)。干预家庭的能量摄入量从每天1750±650千卡增至2138±704千卡(p<0.001),而对照家庭未观察到显著变化。干预家庭中来自谷物的能量百分比从85%降至78%(p<0.001),而对照家庭保持不变。
CFPR/TUP项目似乎对极端贫困家庭大幅增加食物和能源消费的能力有直接影响。