Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Stop TB Department, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2011 Jun;15 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):37-49. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.10.0438.
To quantify the impact of cash transfer and microfinance interventions on a selected list of tuberculosis (TB) risk factors and assess their potential role in supporting TB control.
Published and unpublished references identified from clinical and social electronic databases, grey literature and web sites.
Eligible interventions had to be conducted in middle- or low-income countries and document an impact evaluation on any of the following outcomes: 1) TB or other respiratory infections; 2) household socio-economic position; and 3) factors mediating the association between low household socio-economic position and TB, including inadequate health-seeking behaviours, food insecurity and biological TB risk factors such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and adult malnutrition. Interventions targeting special populations were excluded.
Fifteen cash transfer schemes (four unconditional and 11 conditional) and seven microfinance programmes met the eligibility criteria. No intervention addressed TB or any other respiratory infection. Of 11 cash transfer and four microfinance interventions, respectively seven and four reported a positive impact on indicators of economic well-being. A positive impact on household food security was documented in respectively eight of nine and three of five cash transfer and microfinance interventions. Improved health care access was documented respectively in 10 of 12 cash transfer and four of five microfinance interventions. The only intervention evaluating impact on HIV incidence was a microfinance project that found no effect. No cash transfer or microfinance interventions had an impact on adult malnutrition.
Cash transfer and microfinance interventions can positively impact TB risk factors. Evaluation studies are urgently needed to assess the impact of these social protection interventions on actual TB indicators.
量化现金转移和小额信贷干预对一系列选定的结核病(TB)风险因素的影响,并评估它们在支持结核病控制方面的潜在作用。
从临床和社会电子数据库、灰色文献和网站中确定已发表和未发表的参考文献。
符合条件的干预措施必须在中低收入国家进行,并记录对以下任何结果的影响评估:1)结核病或其他呼吸道感染;2)家庭社会经济地位;3)调节家庭社会经济地位与结核病之间关联的因素,包括不充分的寻医行为、粮食不安全以及人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)和成人营养不良等生物结核病风险因素。针对特殊人群的干预措施被排除在外。
符合条件的有 15 项现金转移计划(4 项无条件和 11 项有条件)和 7 项小额信贷计划。没有干预措施针对结核病或任何其他呼吸道感染。在 11 项现金转移和 4 项小额信贷干预中,分别有 7 项和 4 项报告了对经济福祉指标的积极影响。在分别有 9 项中的 8 项和 5 项中的 3 项现金转移和小额信贷干预中,记录了对家庭粮食安全的积极影响。在分别有 12 项中的 10 项和 5 项中的 4 项现金转移和小额信贷干预中,记录了改善医疗保健获取。评估 HIV 发病率影响的唯一干预措施是小额信贷项目,没有发现效果。没有现金转移或小额信贷干预对成人营养不良有影响。
现金转移和小额信贷干预可以对结核病风险因素产生积极影响。迫切需要评估这些社会保护干预措施对实际结核病指标的影响的评估研究。