• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

河道修复对渠化河流中水流速度、瞬时存储和养分吸收的影响。

Effects of channel restoration on water velocity, transient storage, and nutrient uptake in a channelized stream.

作者信息

Bukaveckas Paul A

机构信息

Center for Environmental Studies, Department of Biology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia 23111, USA.

出版信息

Environ Sci Technol. 2007 Mar 1;41(5):1570-6. doi: 10.1021/es061618x.

DOI:10.1021/es061618x
PMID:17396643
Abstract

Channel design is an important component of stream restoration, but little is known of the interplay between hydrogeomorphic features and ecosystem processes within designed channels. Water velocity, transient storage, and nutrient uptake were measured in channelized (prerestoration) and naturalized (postrestoration) reaches of a 1-km segment of Wilson Creek (KY) to assess the effects of restoration on mechanisms of nutrient retention. Stream restoration decreased flow velocity and reduced the downstream transport of nutrients. Median travel time was 50% greater in the restored channel due to lower reach-scale water velocity and the longer length of the meandering channel. Transient storage and the influence of transient storage on travel time were largely unaffected except in segments where backwater areas were created. First-order uptake rate coefficients for N and P were 30- and 3-fold higher (respectively) within the restored channel relative to its channelized state. Changes in uptake velocities were comparatively small, suggesting that restoration had little effect on biochemical demand. Results from this study suggest that channel naturalization enhances nutrient uptake by slowing water velocity. Solute injection experiments revealed differences in the functional properties of channelized, restored, and reference streams and provided a means for quantifying benefits associated with restoration of ecosystem services.

摘要

河道设计是河流修复的一个重要组成部分,但对于设计河道内水文地貌特征与生态系统过程之间的相互作用却知之甚少。在肯塔基州威尔逊溪1公里河段的渠化(修复前)和自然化(修复后)河段测量了水流速度、暂态存储和养分吸收,以评估修复对养分截留机制的影响。河流修复降低了流速,减少了养分的下游输送。由于河段尺度的水流速度较低以及蜿蜒河道的长度较长,修复后的河道中位旅行时间长了50%。暂态存储及其对旅行时间的影响在很大程度上未受影响,除非在形成回水区域的河段。与渠化状态相比,修复后的河道内氮和磷的一级吸收速率系数分别高出30倍和3倍。吸收速度的变化相对较小,表明修复对生化需氧量影响不大。本研究结果表明,河道自然化通过减缓水流速度增强了养分吸收。溶质注入实验揭示了渠化、修复和参照溪流功能特性的差异,并提供了一种量化与生态系统服务恢复相关效益的方法。

相似文献

1
Effects of channel restoration on water velocity, transient storage, and nutrient uptake in a channelized stream.河道修复对渠化河流中水流速度、瞬时存储和养分吸收的影响。
Environ Sci Technol. 2007 Mar 1;41(5):1570-6. doi: 10.1021/es061618x.
2
Ecosystem responses to channel restoration decline with stream size in urban river networks.在城市河流网络中,生态系统对河道恢复的响应随河流规模的增大而下降。
Ecol Appl. 2020 Jul;30(5):e02107. doi: 10.1002/eap.2107. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
3
Low transient storage and uptake efficiencies in seven agricultural streams: implications for nutrient demand.七条农业溪流中的低瞬态存储和吸收效率:对养分需求的影响
J Environ Qual. 2014 Nov;43(6):1980-90. doi: 10.2134/jeq2014.01.0034.
4
Effects of riparian forest buffers on in-stream nutrient retention in agricultural catchments.河岸林缓冲带对农业流域溪流中养分截留的影响。
J Environ Qual. 2012 Mar-Apr;41(2):373-9. doi: 10.2134/jeq2010.0436.
5
Effect of periphyton biomass on hydraulic characteristics and nutrient cycling in streams.附生生物量对溪流水力特性和养分循环的影响。
Oecologia. 1994 Jun;98(1):40-47. doi: 10.1007/BF00326088.
6
A hydrologic network supporting spatially referenced regression modeling in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed.一个支持切萨皮克湾流域空间参考回归建模的水文网络。
Environ Monit Assess. 2003 Jan-Feb;81(1-3):73-84.
7
Stream Transport and Retention of Environmental DNA Pulse Releases in Relation to Hydrogeomorphic Scaling Factors.环境 DNA 脉冲释放的水流输移与滞留与水文地貌尺度因子的关系。
Environ Sci Technol. 2019 Jun 18;53(12):6640-6649. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b06829. Epub 2019 Jun 4.
8
A method to quantify and value floodplain sediment and nutrient retention ecosystem services.量化和评估洪泛区泥沙和养分滞留生态系统服务的方法。
J Environ Manage. 2018 Aug 15;220:65-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.05.013. Epub 2018 May 11.
9
Public health perspectives of channelized and unchannelized headwater streams in central Ohio: a case study.俄亥俄州中部渠道化和非渠道化源头溪流的公共卫生观点:案例研究。
J Water Health. 2010 Sep;8(3):577-92. doi: 10.2166/wh.2010.160. Epub 2010 Mar 9.
10
Spatial and temporal variability of agricultural pollutants in an agricultural headwater stream within a multipond system, southeastern China.中国东南部多池塘系统中一条农业源头溪流中农业污染物的时空变异性
J Environ Sci (China). 2004;16(4):697-704.

引用本文的文献

1
Similar but different assembly processes of bacterial and micro-eukaryotic communities in an urban river.城市河流中细菌和微型真核生物群落相似但不同的组装过程。
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 26;15(1):6974. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-91664-y.
2
Evaluating multiannual sedimentary nutrient retention in agricultural two-stage channels.评估农业两阶段渠道多年沉积养分截留情况。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 3;15(1):722. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-84956-2.
3
Freshwater Salinization Syndrome Alters Retention and Release of 'Chemical Cocktails' along Flowpaths: from Stormwater Management to Urban Streams.
淡水盐碱化综合征改变了沿水流路径的“化学混合物”的保留和释放:从雨水管理到城市溪流。
Freshw Sci. 2022 Sep 1;41(3):420-441. doi: 10.1086/721469.
4
Long-term assessment of floodplain reconnection as a stream restoration approach for managing nitrogen in ground and surface waters.作为一种管理地下水和地表水氮含量的溪流修复方法,漫滩重新连接的长期评估
Urban Ecosyst. 2022 Jun;25(3):879-907. doi: 10.1007/s11252-021-01199-z. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
5
Consideration of spatial and temporal scales in stream restorations and biotic monitoring to assess restoration outcomes: A literature review, Part 2.溪流修复与生物监测中用于评估修复效果的时空尺度考量:文献综述,第2部分
River Res Appl. 2020 Oct;36(8):1398-1415. doi: 10.1002/rra.3694. Epub 2020 Aug 23.
6
Floodplain restoration increases hyporheic flow in the Yakima River Watershed, Washington.洪泛区恢复增加了华盛顿州亚基马河流域的潜流。
Ecol Eng. 2018;116:110-120. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.02.001.
7
Fine Sediment Removal Influences Biogeochemical Processes in a Gravel-bottomed Stream.细颗粒泥沙去除对砾石底溪流生物地球化学过程的影响。
Environ Manage. 2019 Sep;64(3):258-271. doi: 10.1007/s00267-019-01187-2. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
8
Influence of urban river restoration on nitrogen dynamics at the sediment-water interface.城市河流修复对底泥-水界面氮动态的影响。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 13;14(3):e0212690. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212690. eCollection 2019.
9
Before and after integrated catchment management in a headwater catchment: changes in water quality.源头集水区综合集水区管理前后:水质变化
Environ Manage. 2014 Dec;54(6):1288-305. doi: 10.1007/s00267-014-0369-9. Epub 2014 Sep 17.
10
Ecological engineering practices for the reduction of excess nitrogen in human-influenced landscapes: a guide for watershed managers.人类活动影响景观中过量氮的生态工程实践:流域管理者指南。
Environ Manage. 2013 Feb;51(2):392-413. doi: 10.1007/s00267-012-9970-y. Epub 2012 Nov 22.