• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

源头集水区综合集水区管理前后:水质变化

Before and after integrated catchment management in a headwater catchment: changes in water quality.

作者信息

Hughes Andrew O, Quinn John M

机构信息

National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Limited, P.O. Box 11 115, Hamilton, New Zealand,

出版信息

Environ Manage. 2014 Dec;54(6):1288-305. doi: 10.1007/s00267-014-0369-9. Epub 2014 Sep 17.

DOI:10.1007/s00267-014-0369-9
PMID:25228091
Abstract

Few studies have comprehensively measured the effect on water quality of catchment rehabilitation measures in comparison with baseline conditions. Here we have analyzed water clarity and nutrient concentrations and loads for a 13-year period in a headwater catchment within the western Waikato region, New Zealand. For the first 6 years, the entire catchment was used for hill-country cattle and sheep grazing. An integrated catchment management plan was implemented whereby cattle were excluded from riparian areas, the most degraded land was planted in Pinus radiata, channel banks were planted with poplar trees and the beef cattle enterprise was modified. The removal of cattle from riparian areas without additional riparian planting had a positive and rapid effect on stream water clarity. In contrast, the water clarity decreased in those sub-catchments where livestock was excluded but riparian areas were planted with trees and shrubs. We attribute the decrease in water clarity to a reduction in groundcover vegetation that armors stream banks against preparatory erosion processes. Increases in concentrations of forms of P and N were recorded. These increases were attributed to: (i) the reduction of instream nutrient uptake by macrophytes and periphyton due to increased riparian shading; (ii) uncontrolled growth of a nitrogen fixing weed (gorse) in some parts of the catchment, and (iii) the reduction in the nutrient attenuation capacity of seepage wetlands due to the decrease in their areal coverage in response to afforestation. Our findings highlight the complex nature of the water quality response to catchment rehabilitation measures.

摘要

与基线条件相比,很少有研究全面衡量集水区恢复措施对水质的影响。在此,我们分析了新西兰怀卡托地区西部一个源头集水区13年间的水体透明度以及营养物浓度和负荷。在最初的6年里,整个集水区用于山地牛羊放牧。随后实施了一项综合集水区管理计划,其中包括将牛群排除在河岸地区,在退化最严重的土地上种植辐射松,在河道两岸种植杨树,并对肉牛养殖企业进行调整。在河岸地区去除牛群且不进行额外河岸种植,对河流水体透明度产生了积极且迅速的影响。相比之下,在那些排除了牲畜但河岸地区种植了树木和灌木的子集水区,水体透明度下降了。我们将水体透明度的下降归因于地被植被的减少,而地被植被原本可以保护河岸免受前期侵蚀过程的影响。记录到了磷和氮形态的浓度增加。这些增加归因于:(i) 河岸遮荫增加导致大型植物和周丛生物对河流水体营养物的吸收减少;(ii) 集水区某些区域一种固氮杂草(金雀花)的无节制生长;以及(iii) 由于造林导致渗流湿地面积覆盖减少,其营养物衰减能力下降。我们的研究结果凸显了集水区恢复措施对水质响应的复杂性质。

相似文献

1
Before and after integrated catchment management in a headwater catchment: changes in water quality.源头集水区综合集水区管理前后:水质变化
Environ Manage. 2014 Dec;54(6):1288-305. doi: 10.1007/s00267-014-0369-9. Epub 2014 Sep 17.
2
Nutrient loss and water quality under extensive grazing in the upper Burdekin river catchment, North Queensland.北昆士兰伯德金河上游流域粗放式放牧下的养分流失与水质
Mar Pollut Bull. 2005;51(1-4):37-50. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2004.10.023. Epub 2004 Dec 8.
3
Riparian wetland rehabilitation and beaver re-colonization impacts on hydrological processes and water quality in a lowland agricultural catchment.低地农业流域河岸湿地恢复和海狸再殖民对水文过程和水质的影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Jan 10;699:134302. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134302. Epub 2019 Sep 7.
4
Implications of hydrologic connectivity between hillslopes and riparian zones on streamflow composition.坡面与河岸带之间水文连通性对径流组成的影响。
J Contam Hydrol. 2014 Nov 15;169:62-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2014.07.005. Epub 2014 Jul 25.
5
Fit-for-purpose phosphorus management: do riparian buffers qualify in catchments with sandy soils?适地性磷管理:在沙质土壤的集水区中,河岸缓冲带是否符合要求?
Environ Monit Assess. 2014 May;186(5):2867-84. doi: 10.1007/s10661-013-3586-4. Epub 2014 Jan 7.
6
A review of sediment and nutrient concentration data from Australia for use in catchment water quality models.澳大利亚泥沙和养分浓度数据综述,供集水区水质模型使用。
Mar Pollut Bull. 2012;65(4-9):101-16. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.08.009. Epub 2011 Sep 1.
7
Evaluating stream water quality through land use analysis in two grassland catchments: impact of wetlands on stream nitrogen concentration.通过两个草原集水区的土地利用分析评估溪流水质:湿地对溪流氮浓度的影响。
J Environ Qual. 2006 Mar 1;35(2):617-27. doi: 10.2134/jeq2005.0343. Print 2006 Mar-Apr.
8
Sources of sediment and phosphorus in stream flow of a highly productive dairy farmed catchment.高产奶牛养殖集水区溪流中沉积物和磷的来源
J Environ Qual. 2007 Mar 1;36(2):540-8. doi: 10.2134/jeq2006.0352. Print 2007 Mar-Apr.
9
Controls on nutrients across a prairie stream watershed: land use and riparian cover effects.草原溪流流域养分的控制因素:土地利用和河岸植被覆盖的影响
Environ Manage. 2006 May;37(5):634-46. doi: 10.1007/s00267-004-0072-3.
10
Phosphorus and sediment loss in a catchment with winter forage grazing of cropland by dairy cattle.奶牛冬季在农田放牧的集水区内磷和沉积物流失情况。
J Environ Qual. 2006 Mar 1;35(2):575-83. doi: 10.2134/jeq2005.0364. Print 2006 Mar-Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
The Role of Headwater Streams in Downstream Water Quality.源头溪流在下游水质中的作用。
J Am Water Resour Assoc. 2007 Feb;43(1):41-59. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2007.00005.x.
2
Headwater influences on downstream water quality.源头对下游水质的影响。
Environ Manage. 2008 Mar;41(3):367-77. doi: 10.1007/s00267-007-9033-y.
3
Ecological success in stream restoration: case studies from the midwestern United States.溪流修复中的生态成功:来自美国中西部的案例研究。
Environ Manage. 2007 Aug;40(2):245-55. doi: 10.1007/s00267-006-0064-6. Epub 2007 Jun 4.
4
Effects of channel restoration on water velocity, transient storage, and nutrient uptake in a channelized stream.河道修复对渠化河流中水流速度、瞬时存储和养分吸收的影响。
Environ Sci Technol. 2007 Mar 1;41(5):1570-6. doi: 10.1021/es061618x.
5
Stream buffer effectiveness in an agriculturally influenced area, southwestern Georgia: responses of water quality, macroinvertebrates, and amphibians.佐治亚州西南部一个受农业影响地区的溪流缓冲带有效性:水质、大型无脊椎动物和两栖动物的响应
J Environ Qual. 2006 Sep 13;35(5):1924-38. doi: 10.2134/jeq2005.0456. Print 2006 Sep-Oct.
6
Nitrate removal in riparian wetlands: interactions between surface flow and soils.
J Environ Qual. 2004 May-Jun;33(3):1133-43. doi: 10.2134/jeq2004.1133.
7
Effectiveness of constructed overland flow areas in decreasing diffuse pollution from forest drainages.人工地表径流区域在减少森林排水中面源污染方面的有效性。
Environ Manage. 2003 Nov;32(5):602-13. doi: 10.1007/s00267-003-2927-4.
8
Nitrate removal effectiveness of a riparian buffer along a small agricultural stream in western Oregon.俄勒冈州西部一条小型农业溪流沿岸河岸缓冲带的硝酸盐去除效果
J Environ Qual. 2003 Jan-Feb;32(1):162-70. doi: 10.2134/jeq2003.1620.
9
Framework for measuring sustainable development in catchment systems.流域系统可持续发展衡量框架。
Environ Manage. 2002 Feb;29(2):195-206. doi: 10.1007/s00267-001-0020-4.