Hughes Andrew O, Quinn John M
National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Limited, P.O. Box 11 115, Hamilton, New Zealand,
Environ Manage. 2014 Dec;54(6):1288-305. doi: 10.1007/s00267-014-0369-9. Epub 2014 Sep 17.
Few studies have comprehensively measured the effect on water quality of catchment rehabilitation measures in comparison with baseline conditions. Here we have analyzed water clarity and nutrient concentrations and loads for a 13-year period in a headwater catchment within the western Waikato region, New Zealand. For the first 6 years, the entire catchment was used for hill-country cattle and sheep grazing. An integrated catchment management plan was implemented whereby cattle were excluded from riparian areas, the most degraded land was planted in Pinus radiata, channel banks were planted with poplar trees and the beef cattle enterprise was modified. The removal of cattle from riparian areas without additional riparian planting had a positive and rapid effect on stream water clarity. In contrast, the water clarity decreased in those sub-catchments where livestock was excluded but riparian areas were planted with trees and shrubs. We attribute the decrease in water clarity to a reduction in groundcover vegetation that armors stream banks against preparatory erosion processes. Increases in concentrations of forms of P and N were recorded. These increases were attributed to: (i) the reduction of instream nutrient uptake by macrophytes and periphyton due to increased riparian shading; (ii) uncontrolled growth of a nitrogen fixing weed (gorse) in some parts of the catchment, and (iii) the reduction in the nutrient attenuation capacity of seepage wetlands due to the decrease in their areal coverage in response to afforestation. Our findings highlight the complex nature of the water quality response to catchment rehabilitation measures.
与基线条件相比,很少有研究全面衡量集水区恢复措施对水质的影响。在此,我们分析了新西兰怀卡托地区西部一个源头集水区13年间的水体透明度以及营养物浓度和负荷。在最初的6年里,整个集水区用于山地牛羊放牧。随后实施了一项综合集水区管理计划,其中包括将牛群排除在河岸地区,在退化最严重的土地上种植辐射松,在河道两岸种植杨树,并对肉牛养殖企业进行调整。在河岸地区去除牛群且不进行额外河岸种植,对河流水体透明度产生了积极且迅速的影响。相比之下,在那些排除了牲畜但河岸地区种植了树木和灌木的子集水区,水体透明度下降了。我们将水体透明度的下降归因于地被植被的减少,而地被植被原本可以保护河岸免受前期侵蚀过程的影响。记录到了磷和氮形态的浓度增加。这些增加归因于:(i) 河岸遮荫增加导致大型植物和周丛生物对河流水体营养物的吸收减少;(ii) 集水区某些区域一种固氮杂草(金雀花)的无节制生长;以及(iii) 由于造林导致渗流湿地面积覆盖减少,其营养物衰减能力下降。我们的研究结果凸显了集水区恢复措施对水质响应的复杂性质。