Robb Karen A, Newham Di J, Williams John E
Division of Applied Biomedical Sciences Research, School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, King's College London, United Kingdom.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007 Apr;33(4):410-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006.09.020.
Chronic pain associated with breast cancer treatment is becoming increasingly recognized. Patients with this condition can experience significant physical and psychological morbidity and may benefit from nonpharmacological interventions as part of a multidisciplinary team approach. We compared the effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), transcutaneous spinal electroanalgesia (TSE), and a placebo (sham TSE) in a randomized controlled trial. The study sample comprised 41 women with chronic pain following breast cancer treatment, and outcome measures included pain report, pain relief, pain interference, anxiety and depression, arm mobility, and analgesic consumption. There was little evidence to suggest that TENS or TSE were more effective than placebo. All three interventions had beneficial effects on both pain report and quality of life, a finding that may be due to either psychophysical improvements resulting from the personal interaction involved in the treatment or a placebo response. Although electrical stimulation appears to be well tolerated in this population, further research is needed to establish its effectiveness for chronic cancer treatment-related pain.
与乳腺癌治疗相关的慢性疼痛越来越受到关注。患有这种疾病的患者会出现明显的身心疾病,作为多学科团队治疗方法的一部分,他们可能会从非药物干预中受益。我们在一项随机对照试验中比较了经皮电刺激神经疗法(TENS)、经皮脊髓电刺激镇痛法(TSE)和安慰剂(假TSE)的效果。研究样本包括41名乳腺癌治疗后患有慢性疼痛的女性,结果测量包括疼痛报告、疼痛缓解、疼痛干扰、焦虑和抑郁、手臂活动能力以及镇痛药使用量。几乎没有证据表明TENS或TSE比安慰剂更有效。所有三种干预措施对疼痛报告和生活质量都有有益影响,这一发现可能是由于治疗中人际互动带来的心理生理改善,或者是安慰剂反应。尽管电刺激在该人群中似乎耐受性良好,但仍需要进一步研究以确定其对慢性癌症治疗相关疼痛的有效性。