Suppr超能文献

快速心脏麻醉后的早期口服镇痛

Early oral analgesia after fast-track cardiac anesthesia.

作者信息

Kogan Alexander, Medalion Benjamen, Raanani Ehud, Sharoni Erez, Stamler Alon, Pak Natalia, Vidne Bernardo A, Eidelman Leonid A

机构信息

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Campus, Petah Tiqwa 49100, Israel.

出版信息

Can J Anaesth. 2007 Apr;54(4):254-61. doi: 10.1007/BF03022769.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Oral analgesia after "fast-track" cardiac anesthesia has not been explored. The aim of this study was to compare two oral oxycodone analgesic regimens.

METHODS

One hundred-twenty patients scheduled for coronary artery bypass grafting were randomly assigned postoperatively to receive immediate-release oxycodone 5 mg and acetaminophen 325 mg (Percocet-5) (group I) per os four times daily, or controlled-release oxycodone 10 mg (OxyContin) (group II) per os every 12 hr and placebo twice daily. Acetaminophen 500 mg per os was used as first-line rescue medication, and immediate-release oxycodone (syrup form) 5 mg per os as second-line rescue medication. Pain intensity was assessed with a visual analogue scale on the first postoperative day, the morning after extubation, and thereafter four times daily for four days. Use of rescue medication and adverse events were recorded.

RESULTS

Baseline demographic and operation-related characteristics were similar in both groups. While pain control was good in both groups, the immediate-release group experienced less pain on all postoperative days (P = 0.003), required significantly less rescue medication, and had fewer adverse effects such as somnolence and nausea.

CONCLUSION

Peroral oxycodone is effective for early pain control after fast-track cardiac anesthesia. Immediate-release oxycodone/ acetaminophen appears to provide better analgesia and fewer side effects compared to controlled-release oxycodone.

摘要

目的

尚未对“快通道”心脏麻醉后的口服镇痛进行研究。本研究的目的是比较两种口服羟考酮镇痛方案。

方法

120例计划行冠状动脉旁路移植术的患者术后被随机分配,一组每日4次口服即释羟考酮5mg和对乙酰氨基酚325mg(氨酚羟考酮-5)(第一组),另一组每12小时口服控释羟考酮10mg(奥施康定)(第二组),并每日2次服用安慰剂。口服对乙酰氨基酚500mg作为一线急救药物,口服即释羟考酮(糖浆剂型)5mg作为二线急救药物。在术后第一天、拔管后早晨以及此后四天每天4次,用视觉模拟评分法评估疼痛强度。记录急救药物的使用情况和不良事件。

结果

两组的基线人口统计学和手术相关特征相似。虽然两组的疼痛控制都良好,但即释组在所有术后天数的疼痛较轻(P = 0.003),所需急救药物显著较少,且嗜睡和恶心等不良反应较少。

结论

口服羟考酮对快通道心脏麻醉后的早期疼痛控制有效。与控释羟考酮相比,即释羟考酮/对乙酰氨基酚似乎能提供更好的镇痛效果且副作用更少。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验