• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Cytotoxicity analysis of EDTA and citric acid applied on murine resident macrophages culture.

作者信息

Amaral K F, Rogero M M, Fock R A, Borelli P, Gavini G

机构信息

Department of Endodontics, Dental School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Int Endod J. 2007 May;40(5):338-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01220.x. Epub 2007 Apr 2.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01220.x
PMID:17403041
Abstract

AIM

To assess the ex vivo cytotoxicity of EDTA and citric acid solutions on macrophages.

METHODOLOGY

The cytotoxicity of 17% EDTA and 15% citric acid was evaluated on murine macrophage cultures using MTT-Tetrazolium method [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5 diphenyl tetrazolium bromide]. A total of 5 x 10(5) cells were plated in medium culture with 17% EDTA or 15% citric acid. Fresh medium was used as a control. Toxicity values were analysed statistically by anova and Tukey's test (P<0.05) at short (0, 6, 12, 24 h) and medium periods (1, 3, 5, 7 days), using ELISA absorbance.

RESULTS

On the short term, both EDTA (0.253 nm) and citric acid (0.260 nm) exhibited cytotoxic effects on macrophage cultures (P<0.05). On the medium term, statistical differences were observed (P<0.05) between the groups. EDTA (0.158 nm) and citric acid (0.219 nm) were cytotoxic when compared with the control group; EDTA-reduced macrophage viability significantly more than citric acid (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Both EDTA and citric acid had effects on macrophages cells ex vivo, but citric acid was less toxic in periods from 1 to 7 days of use.

摘要

相似文献

1
Cytotoxicity analysis of EDTA and citric acid applied on murine resident macrophages culture.
Int Endod J. 2007 May;40(5):338-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01220.x. Epub 2007 Apr 2.
2
Endodontic chelators induce nitric oxide expression by murine-cultured macrophages.牙髓螯合剂可诱导小鼠培养巨噬细胞表达一氧化氮。
J Endod. 2009 Jun;35(6):824-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.03.002. Epub 2009 Apr 19.
3
Cytotoxic effects of 10% citric acid and EDTA-T used as root canal irrigants: an in vitro analysis.10%柠檬酸和乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA-T)作为根管冲洗剂的细胞毒性作用:一项体外分析
J Endod. 2001 Dec;27(12):741-3. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200112000-00007.
4
In vitro evaluation of the cytotoxic effects of acid solutions used as canal irrigants.用作根管冲洗剂的酸性溶液细胞毒性作用的体外评估。
J Endod. 2005 Oct;31(10):746-8. doi: 10.1097/01.don.0000157994.49432.67.
5
Decalcifying effect of 15% EDTA, 15% citric acid, 5% phosphoric acid and 2.5% sodium hypochlorite on root canal dentine.15%乙二胺四乙酸、15%柠檬酸、5%磷酸和2.5%次氯酸钠对根管牙本质的脱钙作用。
Int Endod J. 2008 May;41(5):418-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01371.x. Epub 2008 Feb 20.
6
Cytotoxic effects of different concentrations of neutral and alkaline EDTA solutions used as root canal irrigants.用作根管冲洗剂的不同浓度中性和碱性乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)溶液的细胞毒性作用。
J Endod. 1999 Jan;25(1):21-3. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(99)80393-8.
7
In vitro genotoxicity and cytotoxicity in murine fibroblasts exposed to EDTA, NaOCl, MTAD and citric acid.暴露于乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)、次氯酸钠(NaOCl)、甲基丙烯酸甲酯-三丁胺(MTAD)和柠檬酸的小鼠成纤维细胞的体外遗传毒性和细胞毒性。
Braz Dent J. 2012;23(5):527-33. doi: 10.1590/s0103-64402012000500010.
8
Evaluation of cytotoxicity of MTAD using the MTT-tetrazolium method.
J Endod. 2003 Oct;29(10):654-7. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200310000-00010.
9
Biocompatibility of EDTA, EGTA and citric acid.乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)、乙二醇双四乙酸(EGTA)和柠檬酸的生物相容性。
Braz Dent J. 2005;16(1):3-8. doi: 10.1590/s0103-64402005000100001. Epub 2005 Aug 17.
10
Effect of CHX on the decalcifying effect of 10% citric acid, 20% citric acid, or 17% EDTA.CHX对10%柠檬酸、20%柠檬酸或17%乙二胺四乙酸脱钙效果的影响。
J Endod. 2006 Aug;32(8):781-4. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2006.02.006. Epub 2006 Jun 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Biocompatibility of irrigation solutions to dental-derived mesenchymal stem cells in regenerative endodontic procedure: a systematic review of in vitro studies.
Odontology. 2025 Oct;113(4):1315-1329. doi: 10.1007/s10266-025-01087-4. Epub 2025 Mar 20.
2
Glycolic acid on push-out bond strength of fiber post and smear removal: an in vitro study.果酸对纤维桩推出强度和玷污去除的影响:一项体外研究。
Odontology. 2024 Jul;112(3):739-750. doi: 10.1007/s10266-024-00928-y. Epub 2024 Mar 20.
3
Phytic Acid Demonstrates Rapid Antibiofilm Activity and Inhibits Biofilm Formation When Used as a Surface Conditioning Agent.植酸作为一种表面调理剂,表现出快速抗生物膜活性,并能抑制生物膜的形成。
Microbiol Spectr. 2023 Jun 15;11(3):e0026723. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00267-23. Epub 2023 May 16.
4
Assessment of acute inhalation toxicity of citric acid and sodium hypochlorite in rats.柠檬酸和次氯酸钠急性吸入毒性在大鼠体内的评估。
J Vet Sci. 2023 Mar;24(2):e22. doi: 10.4142/jvs.22253.
5
Anti-biofilm effects and healing promotion by silver oxynitrate-based dressings.基于硝酸氧银的敷料的抗生物膜作用和促进愈合。
Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 3;13(1):2014. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-26856-x.
6
Pectin-based bioinks for 3D models of neural tissue produced by a pH-controlled kinetics.基于果胶的生物墨水用于通过pH控制动力学产生的神经组织3D模型。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Dec 22;10:1032542. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.1032542. eCollection 2022.
7
Effectiveness of ultrasonic activation over glycolic acid on microhardness, cohesive strength, flexural strength, and fracture resistance of the root dentin.超声激活与乙醇酸对牙根牙本质的显微硬度、粘结强度、抗弯强度及抗折性的效果比较
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Apr;27(4):1659-1664. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04792-4. Epub 2022 Nov 21.
8
Can the Concentration of Citric Acid Affect Its Cytotoxicity and Antimicrobial Activity?柠檬酸的浓度会影响其细胞毒性和抗菌活性吗?
Dent J (Basel). 2022 Aug 9;10(8):148. doi: 10.3390/dj10080148.
9
Present status and future directions - irrigants and irrigation methods.现状与未来方向——冲洗剂和冲洗方法。
Int Endod J. 2022 May;55 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):588-612. doi: 10.1111/iej.13739. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
10
Antimicrobial Activity of Phytic Acid: An Emerging Agent in Endodontics.植酸的抗菌活性:牙髓病学中的新兴药物。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021 Oct 26;11:753649. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.753649. eCollection 2021.