Souza Matheus Albino, Ricci Rafaela, Bischoff Karolina Frick, Reuter Eduarda, Ferreira Eduarda Rizzon, Dallepiane Felipe Gomes, Quevedo Laura Mezzalira, Pereira Luiz Henrique Bergoli, Bischoff Luiza Frick, Hofstetter Mariana Gabriela, Brammer Mariana Patussi, Bernardes Natália Miranda, Bervian Juliane
School of Dentistry, University of Passo Fundo, Passo Fundo, RS, Brazil.
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Apr;27(4):1659-1664. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04792-4. Epub 2022 Nov 21.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of ultrasonic activation (US) over glycolic acid on microhardness, cohesive strength, flexural strength, and fracture resistance of root dentin, comparing with conventional final irrigation protocols.
Samples were obtained from 140 extracted bovine teeth and distributed into four test groups: microhardness (50 teeth), cohesive strength (15 teeth), flexural strength (15 teeth), and fracture resistance (60 teeth). In all four tests, specimens were subdivided into five groups, according to final irrigation protocols: G1: distilled water (DW); G2: 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA); G3: 17% glycolic acid (GA); G4: 17% EDTA + US; and G5: 17% GA + US. The duration time of each protocol was set in 1 min. After irrigation protocols, the Vickers tester was used to evaluate microhardness and the universal testing machine was used to evaluate the cohesive strength, flexural strength, and fracture resistance of the root dentin. One-way ANOVA test and the Tukey HSD were used for multiple comparison tests in all evaluations (α = 5%).
In general, groups 2 (EDTA), 4 (EDTA + US), and 5 (GA + US) promoted the highest reduction of microhardness, being statistically different from other groups (p < 0.05). Cohesive strength, flexural strength, and fracture resistance data revealed that no differences between groups were observed (p > 0.05).
The association of GA and US results in microhardness reduction, with no influence on cohesive strength, flexural strength, and fracture resistance of the root dentin.
The use of US over GA has no influence on some mechanical properties of root dentin.
本研究旨在评估超声激活(US)与乙醇酸相比,在牙本质微硬度、粘结强度、抗弯强度和抗折性方面的效果,并与传统的最终冲洗方案进行比较。
从140颗拔除的牛牙中获取样本,分为四个测试组:微硬度(50颗牙)、粘结强度(15颗牙)、抗弯强度(15颗牙)和抗折性(60颗牙)。在所有四项测试中,根据最终冲洗方案将标本再细分为五组:G1:蒸馏水(DW);G2:17%乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA);G3:17%乙醇酸(GA);G4:17% EDTA + US;G5:17% GA + US。每个方案的持续时间设定为1分钟。冲洗方案结束后,使用维氏硬度计评估微硬度,使用万能试验机评估牙本质的粘结强度、抗弯强度和抗折性。在所有评估中,采用单因素方差分析和Tukey HSD进行多重比较检验(α = 5%)。
总体而言,第2组(EDTA)、第4组(EDTA + US)和第5组(GA + US)导致微硬度降低最多,与其他组有统计学差异(p < 0.05)。粘结强度、抗弯强度和抗折性数据显示,各组之间未观察到差异(p > 0.05)。
GA与US联合使用会导致微硬度降低,但对牙本质的粘结强度、抗弯强度和抗折性没有影响。
与GA相比,US的使用对牙本质的某些力学性能没有影响。