Suppr超能文献

炎症、止血和流变学因素对新发心肌梗死和中风的相对价值:爱丁堡动脉研究

Relative value of inflammatory, hemostatic, and rheological factors for incident myocardial infarction and stroke: the Edinburgh Artery Study.

作者信息

Tzoulaki Ioanna, Murray Gordon D, Lee Amanda J, Rumley Ann, Lowe Gordon D O, Fowkes F Gerald R

机构信息

Wolfson Unit for Prevention of Peripheral Vascular Diseases, Public Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Teviot Place, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, UK.

出版信息

Circulation. 2007 Apr 24;115(16):2119-27. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.635029. Epub 2007 Apr 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of our present study was to compare the association of a wide range of 17 biomarkers of inflammation, hemostasis, and blood rheology with incident heart disease and stroke after accounting for an indicator of subclinical atherosclerotic disease and traditional risk factors and also to determine their incremental predictive ability.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We used data from the Edinburgh Artery Study, a population cohort study started in 1987 that comprised 1592 men and women aged 55 to 74 years. Subjects were followed for a mean of 17 years, and 416 of them suffered at least 1 cardiovascular event. In analyses adjusted for cardiovascular risk factors and history of cardiovascular disease (CVD): C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, fibrinogen, fibrin D-dimer, tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA), leukocyte elastase, and lipoprotein(a) (all P<0.01), as well as von Willebrand factor and plasma viscosity (both P<0.05), had significant hazard ratios for incident CVD. Further adjustment for a measure of subclinical atherosclerosis (ankle brachial index) had little impact on these associations. The hazard ratios (95% CI) for incident CVD between top and bottom tertiles in the latter analysis were 1.78 (1.30 to 2.45) for C-reactive protein, 1.85 (1.33 to 2.58) for interleukin-6, and 1.76 (1.35 to 2.31) for fibrinogen. Single biomarkers provided little additional discrimination of incident CVD to that obtained from cardiovascular risk factors and the ankle brachial index. An incremental score of multiple markers [interleukin-6, t-PA, intercellular adhesion molecule 1, and lipoprotein(a)] provided some added discrimination.

CONCLUSIONS

Several "novel" risk factors predicted CVD after adjustments for conventional risk factors and also for a measure of asymptomatic disease. However, their incremental predictive ability was modest and their clinical utility remains uncertain.

摘要

背景

我们当前研究的目的是在考虑亚临床动脉粥样硬化疾病指标和传统危险因素后,比较一系列广泛的炎症、止血和血液流变学的17种生物标志物与心脏病和中风发病之间的关联,并确定它们的增量预测能力。

方法与结果

我们使用了爱丁堡动脉研究的数据,这是一项始于1987年的人群队列研究,包括1592名年龄在55至74岁之间的男性和女性。受试者平均随访17年,其中416人至少发生过1次心血管事件。在针对心血管危险因素和心血管疾病(CVD)病史进行调整的分析中:C反应蛋白、白细胞介素-6、纤维蛋白原、纤维蛋白D-二聚体、组织纤溶酶原激活物(t-PA)、白细胞弹性蛋白酶和脂蛋白(a)(所有P<0.01),以及血管性血友病因子和血浆粘度(两者P<0.05),对于CVD发病具有显著的风险比。进一步针对亚临床动脉粥样硬化的一项指标(踝臂指数)进行调整,对这些关联影响不大。在后者的分析中,C反应蛋白、白细胞介素-6和纤维蛋白原处于最高和最低三分位数之间的CVD发病风险比(95%CI)分别为1.78(1.30至2.45)、1.85(1.33至2.58)和1.76(1.35至2.31)。单一生物标志物对CVD发病的额外鉴别能力相对于从心血管危险因素和踝臂指数获得的鉴别能力而言很小。多个标志物(白细胞介素-6、t-PA、细胞间粘附分子1和脂蛋白(a))的增量评分提供了一些额外的鉴别能力。

结论

在对传统危险因素以及无症状疾病指标进行调整后,几种“新型”危险因素可预测CVD。然而,它们的增量预测能力有限,其临床实用性仍不确定。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验