Bray R C, Shrive N G, Frank C B, Chimich D D
Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
J Orthop Res. 1992 Mar;10(2):157-66. doi: 10.1002/jor.1100100202.
In this study, the short-term effects of immobilization on joint damage and medial collateral ligament (MCL) healing were investigated in unstable, anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient knees in rabbits. Forty-six 12-month-old female New Zealand white rabbits were separated into three groups. Animals from each group had surgery on their right knees: group I, sham controls (n = 9); group II, complete transection of the ACL and removal of a 4 mm segment (gap injury) of MCL midsubstance with no immobilization of the limb (n = 19); and group III, same injuries to the ACL and MCL (as group II) but with immobilization of the limb (n = 18). No surgical repair of disrupted ligaments was performed. Left knees served as unoperated contralateral controls. All animals were allowed unrestricted cage activity until sacrifice in subgroups at 3, 6, and 14 weeks of healing when biomechanical properties of all MCLs were measured. All knee joints were systematically examined for gross evidence of damage to articular cartilage, menisci, and periarticular soft tissues. To monitor relative in vivo loads on injured limbs during healing, hindlimb weight bearing was assessed at biweekly intervals. Results indicated that animals in both groups II and III bore relatively lower loads (compared to preinjury values) on their injured hindlimbs. Mechanical testing of MCLs showed only minor changes in sham controls, while group II and III healing MCLs demonstrated significantly lower force and stress at MCL complex failure compared to contralateral controls. In specific comparisons of group III to group II animals, we noted that immobilization prevented joint damage over the early intervals studied. In addition, immobilization resulted in MCL laxity similar to contralateral control values but inhibited development of structural strength and stiffness in healing MCLs. These results suggest that in the rabbit, short-term immobilization of an ACL-deficient knee offers some advantages to the joint and to certain low load behaviors of the healing MCL, but it also results in a smaller quantity of scar tissue that is less able to resist higher loads. Longer-term studies involving remobilization are necessary before the effects of brief immobilization on joint damage and MCL healing in this ACL-deficient model can be fully defined.
在本研究中,我们调查了制动对兔不稳定、前交叉韧带(ACL)缺失膝关节的关节损伤和内侧副韧带(MCL)愈合的短期影响。将46只12月龄雌性新西兰白兔分为三组。每组动物均对其右膝进行手术:第一组为假手术对照组(n = 9);第二组,完全切断ACL并切除MCL中间部分4 mm节段(间隙损伤),肢体不制动(n = 19);第三组,ACL和MCL损伤情况与第二组相同,但肢体进行制动(n = 18)。未对断裂韧带进行手术修复。左膝作为未手术的对侧对照。所有动物在愈合的3、6和14周时,在各亚组处死前均允许在笼内自由活动,此时测量所有MCL的生物力学特性。对所有膝关节系统检查关节软骨、半月板和关节周围软组织损伤的大体证据。为监测愈合过程中受伤肢体的相对体内负荷,每两周评估一次后肢负重情况。结果表明,第二组和第三组动物受伤后肢的负荷(与伤前值相比)相对较低。MCL的力学测试显示假手术对照组仅有微小变化,而第二组和第三组愈合中的MCL与对侧对照相比,在MCL复合体失效时的力和应力显著降低。在第三组与第二组动物的具体比较中,我们注意到在研究的早期阶段制动可防止关节损伤。此外,制动导致MCL松弛程度与对侧对照值相似,但抑制了愈合中MCL结构强度和刚度的发展。这些结果表明,在兔中,对ACL缺失膝关节进行短期制动对关节和愈合中MCL的某些低负荷行为有一些益处,但也会导致瘢痕组织数量减少,抵抗更高负荷的能力降低。在能够充分确定这种ACL缺失模型中短期制动对关节损伤和MCL愈合的影响之前,有必要进行涉及重新活动的长期研究。