• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

质量保证与发病率和死亡率会议

Quality assurance and morbidity and mortality conference.

作者信息

Thompson J S, Prior M A

机构信息

Surgical Service Omaha VAMC, Nebraska.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 1992 Feb;52(2):97-100. doi: 10.1016/0022-4804(92)90285-8.

DOI:10.1016/0022-4804(92)90285-8
PMID:1740943
Abstract

Many surgeons assert that Morbidity and Mortality (M & M) conference in itself assures an effective quality assurance (QA) program. Recent emphasis on QA in other sectors has resulted in other processes for evaluating quality of care. The goals of QA programs are to identify adverse patient care events, relate these to specific physicians and use this information to improve patient care, and for credentialing and privileging physicians. Our aim was to determine the role of surgical M & M conference in a QA program which also includes occurrence screening, wound infection surveillance, and surgical case review. The weekly M & M conference is a discussion of identified complications and deaths submitted voluntarily by surgeons. During a 2-year period 5755 procedures were associated with 255 complications and 82 deaths. Only 74% of events identified by occurrence screening, 35% of cases identified by surgical case review, and 54% of wound infections had been submitted to M & M conference. Seventy-four percent of surgical residents and 33% of staff surgeons were present at M & M conference when their complications were discussed. Level of care (I, accepted practice; II, may have managed differently; and III, would have managed differently) was assessed for each complication at M & M conference and by peer review of the medical record for occurrence screening.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

许多外科医生断言,发病率与死亡率(M&M)会议本身就能确保一个有效的质量保证(QA)项目。近期其他领域对质量保证的重视催生了评估医疗质量的其他流程。质量保证项目的目标是识别不良患者护理事件,将这些事件与特定医生关联起来,并利用这些信息改善患者护理,同时用于医生资格认证和特权授予。我们的目的是确定外科M&M会议在一个质量保证项目中的作用,该项目还包括事件筛查、伤口感染监测和手术病例审查。每周的M&M会议是对外科医生自愿提交的已识别并发症和死亡病例的讨论。在两年期间,5755例手术出现了255例并发症和82例死亡。事件筛查识别出的事件中只有74%、手术病例审查识别出的病例中35%以及伤口感染病例中54%被提交到了M&M会议。在讨论其并发症时,74%的外科住院医师和33%的在职外科医生出席了M&M会议。在M&M会议上以及通过对事件筛查的病历进行同行评审,对每种并发症的护理水平(I级,公认做法;II级,可能处理方式不同;III级,肯定处理方式不同)进行了评估。(摘要截选于250词)

相似文献

1
Quality assurance and morbidity and mortality conference.质量保证与发病率和死亡率会议
J Surg Res. 1992 Feb;52(2):97-100. doi: 10.1016/0022-4804(92)90285-8.
2
Identification of surgical complications and deaths: an assessment of the traditional surgical morbidity and mortality conference compared with the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.手术并发症及死亡情况的识别:传统外科发病率和死亡率会议与美国外科医师学会-国家外科质量改进计划的评估比较
J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Nov;203(5):618-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.07.010. Epub 2006 Sep 27.
3
Morbidity and mortality conference is not sufficient for surgical quality control: Processes and outcomes of a successful attending Physician Peer Review committee.发病率和死亡率会议不足以进行外科质量控制:一个成功的主治医师同行评审委员会的流程与结果
Am J Surg. 2017 Nov;214(5):780-785. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.04.008. Epub 2017 May 3.
4
Understanding Quality Issues in Your Surgical Department: Comparing the ACS NSQIP With Traditional Morbidity and Mortality Conferences in a Canadian Academic Hospital.了解您所在外科的质量问题:在一家加拿大教学医院中比较美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划与传统的发病率和死亡率会议
J Surg Educ. 2015 Nov-Dec;72(6):1272-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.05.006. Epub 2015 Jun 26.
5
Discrepancy Between Neurosurgery Morbidity and Mortality Conference Discussions and Hospital Quality Metric Standards.神经外科发病率与死亡率会议讨论内容与医院质量指标标准之间的差异
World Neurosurg. 2018 Jul;115:e105-e110. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.03.195. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
6
Increasing reporting of adverse events to improve the educational value of the morbidity and mortality conference.增加不良事件报告以提高发病率和死亡率会议的教育价值。
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Jan;216(1):50-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.09.010. Epub 2012 Nov 2.
7
Development of a surgical endoscopy database for quality assurance.用于质量保证的外科内窥镜检查数据库的开发。
Am Surg. 1991 Apr;57(4):271-3.
8
Audit filters in quality assurance in pediatric trauma care.儿科创伤护理质量保证中的审核过滤器
J Pediatr Surg. 1993 Jan;28(1):19-25. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(05)80347-1.
9
[Mortality and morbidity conference. Perioperative fatalities].
Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd. 1991:333-9.
10
Comparing performance of Morbidity and Mortality Conference and National Surgical Quality Improvement Program for detection of complications after urologic surgery.比较发病率和死亡率会议与国家外科质量改进计划在检测泌尿外科手术后并发症方面的表现。
Urology. 2006 Nov;68(5):931-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.06.018.

引用本文的文献

1
Pediatric Surgeon Perceptions of Participation in External Patient Safety Programs: impact on Patient Safety.儿科外科医生对参与外部患者安全计划的看法:对患者安全的影响
Pediatr Qual Saf. 2018 Dec 6;3(6):e124. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000124. eCollection 2018 Nov-Dec.
2
A resident-driven mortality case review innovation to teach and drive system-based practice improvements in the United States.美国一项由住院医师主导的死亡率病例审查创新举措,旨在传授并推动基于系统的实践改进。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2018;15:31. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2018.15.31. Epub 2018 Dec 26.
3
At the Crossroad with Morbidity and Mortality Conferences: Lessons Learned through a Narrative Systematic Review.
在发病率和死亡率会议的十字路口:通过叙事系统性综述吸取的经验教训。
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;2016:7679196. doi: 10.1155/2016/7679196. Epub 2016 Apr 17.
4
Disclosure of adverse events and errors in surgical care: challenges and strategies for improvement.手术护理中不良事件和差错的披露:改进的挑战与策略
World J Surg. 2014 Jul;38(7):1614-21. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2564-5.
5
Modification of the surgical morbidity and mortality meetings as a tool to improve patient safety.改进手术发病率和死亡率会议作为提高患者安全的工具。
Oman Med J. 2011 Jul;26(4):290-2. doi: 10.5001/omj.2011.72.
6
Educational quality improvement report: outcomes from a revised morbidity and mortality format that emphasised patient safety.教育质量提升报告:一份强调患者安全的修订版发病率与死亡率报告的成果
Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Dec;16(6):422-7. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.021139.
7
Beyond the medical record: other modes of error acknowledgment.超越病历:其他错误确认方式。
J Gen Intern Med. 2005 May;20(5):404-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0098.x.
8
Morbidity and mortality conference: a survey of academic internal medicine departments.发病率与死亡率研讨会:对学术性内科部门的一项调查
J Gen Intern Med. 2003 Aug;18(8):656-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20824.x.
9
Quality of complication reporting in the surgical literature.外科文献中并发症报告的质量。
Ann Surg. 2002 Jun;235(6):803-13. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200206000-00007.
10
Adverse events in health care: issues in measurement.医疗保健中的不良事件:测量问题。
Qual Health Care. 2000 Mar;9(1):47-52. doi: 10.1136/qhc.9.1.47.