Suppr超能文献

用于测量真实荧光光谱的荧光光谱仪的鉴定

Qualification of a fluorescence spectrometer for measuring true fluorescence spectra.

作者信息

DeRose Paul C, Early Edward A, Kramer Gary W

机构信息

National Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8312, USA.

出版信息

Rev Sci Instrum. 2007 Mar;78(3):033107. doi: 10.1063/1.2715952.

Abstract

New analytical methods using fluorescence detection are becoming increasingly quantitative and require easy-to-use material standards for fluorometer qualification and method validation. NIST is responding to this need by developing and producing such standards. Reported here is the first step in this process, which is to qualify a research-grade fluorescence spectrometer for measuring true fluorescence spectra of reference material candidates. "True" spectra are defined here as those with fluorescence intensity, either relative or absolute as required, and wavelength both being reported with high accuracy and known precision, after wavelength has been calibrated and corrections for excitation intensity and detection system response have been applied. The uncertainties determined in relative and absolute intensity-corrected fluorescence spectra using both calibrated source (CS)- and calibrated detector (CD)-based methods were compared. The CS-based method gave uncertainties, typically about +/-5% for relative spectral correction, that were about half that of the CD-based method for determining both relative and absolute spectral correction factors. Absolute spectral correction factors can be determined using either method without knowing the optical geometry of the instrument. The absolute spectral correction factors were found to have much larger uncertainties than the corresponding relative correction factors with uncertainties for the CS-based method of +/-10% to +/-15% being typical and +/-20% or more not being uncommon, particularly for excitation and emission wavelengths below 400 nm. Uncertainties arising from detection system nonlinearity and instrument polarization ratios were also explored.

摘要

使用荧光检测的新分析方法正变得越来越定量,并且需要易于使用的物质标准用于荧光计校准和方法验证。美国国家标准与技术研究院(NIST)正在通过开发和生产此类标准来满足这一需求。本文报道了这一过程的第一步,即对一台研究级荧光光谱仪进行校准,以测量候选参考物质的真实荧光光谱。这里的“真实”光谱定义为,在波长校准以及对激发强度和检测系统响应进行校正之后,其荧光强度(根据需要为相对强度或绝对强度)和波长都能以高精度报告且精度已知的光谱。比较了使用基于校准光源(CS)和基于校准探测器(CD)的方法在相对和绝对强度校正荧光光谱中确定的不确定度。基于CS的方法给出的不确定度,对于相对光谱校正通常约为±5%,这大约是基于CD的方法在确定相对和绝对光谱校正因子时不确定度的一半。在不知道仪器光学几何结构的情况下,可以使用任何一种方法确定绝对光谱校正因子。发现绝对光谱校正因子的不确定度比相应的相对校正因子大得多,基于CS的方法的不确定度通常为±10%至±15%,±20%或更高并不罕见,特别是对于低于400 nm的激发和发射波长。还探讨了检测系统非线性和仪器偏振比引起的不确定度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验