Suppr超能文献

校正发射光谱的最新比较。1. 专家实验室使用物理传递标准和光谱荧光标准进行光谱校正。

State-of-the art comparability of corrected emission spectra. 1. Spectral correction with physical transfer standards and spectral fluorescence standards by expert laboratories.

机构信息

Division I.5, BAM, Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing, Richard-Willstaetter-Strasse 11, D-12489 Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Anal Chem. 2012 May 1;84(9):3889-98. doi: 10.1021/ac2034503. Epub 2012 Apr 16.

Abstract

The development of fluorescence applications in the life and material sciences has proceeded largely without sufficient concern for the measurement uncertainties related to the characterization of fluorescence instruments. In this first part of a two-part series on the state-of-the-art comparability of corrected emission spectra, four National Metrology Institutes active in high-precision steady-state fluorometry performed a first comparison of fluorescence measurement capabilities by evaluating physical transfer standard (PTS)-based and reference material (RM)-based calibration methods. To identify achievable comparability and sources of error in instrument calibration, the emission spectra of three test dyes in the wavelength region from 300 to 770 nm were corrected and compared using both calibration methods. The results, obtained for typical spectrofluorometric (0°/90° transmitting) and colorimetric (45°/0° front-face) measurement geometries, demonstrated a comparability of corrected emission spectra within a relative standard uncertainty of 4.2% for PTS- and 2.4% for RM-based spectral correction when measurements and calibrations were performed under identical conditions. Moreover, the emission spectra of RMs F001 to F005, certified by BAM, Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing, were confirmed. These RMs were subsequently used for the assessment of the comparability of RM-based corrected emission spectra of field laboratories using common commercial spectrofluorometers and routine measurement conditions in part 2 of this series (subsequent paper in this issue).

摘要

荧光在生命科学和材料科学中的应用发展很大程度上没有充分考虑到与荧光仪器特性相关的测量不确定度。在关于校正发射光谱最新进展的两部分系列文章的第一部分中,四个在高精度稳态荧光测量方面活跃的国家计量研究院通过评估基于物理传递标准 (PTS) 和基于参考物质 (RM) 的校准方法,首次对荧光测量能力进行了比较。为了确定仪器校准中的可实现可比性和误差源,使用这两种校准方法对三个测试染料在 300 到 770nm 波长范围内的发射光谱进行了校正和比较。对于典型的分光荧光计(0°/90°透射)和比色计(45°/0°前向)测量几何结构,获得的结果表明,当在相同条件下进行测量和校准时,基于 PTS 的光谱校正的相对标准不确定度为 4.2%,基于 RM 的光谱校正为 2.4%,校正后的发射光谱具有可比性。此外,还对 BAM(德国联邦材料研究与测试研究院)认证的参考物质 F001 到 F005 的发射光谱进行了确认。随后,在本系列文章的第二部分(本期后续文章)中,使用常见的商用荧光计和常规测量条件,评估了现场实验室基于 RM 的校正发射光谱的可比性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验