Suppr超能文献

校正发射光谱的最新比较。2. 使用光谱荧光标准进行现场实验室校准性能评估。

State-of-the art comparability of corrected emission spectra. 2. Field laboratory assessment of calibration performance using spectral fluorescence standards.

机构信息

Division I.5, BAM, Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing, Richard-Willstaetter-Strasse 11, D-12489 Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Anal Chem. 2012 May 1;84(9):3899-907. doi: 10.1021/ac203451g. Epub 2012 Apr 16.

Abstract

In the second part of this two-part series on the state-of-the-art comparability of corrected emission spectra, we have extended this assessment to the broader community of fluorescence spectroscopists by involving 12 field laboratories that were randomly selected on the basis of their fluorescence measuring equipment. These laboratories performed a reference material (RM)-based fluorometer calibration with commercially available spectral fluorescence standards following a standard operating procedure that involved routine measurement conditions and the data evaluation software LINKCORR developed and provided by the Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing (BAM). This instrument-specific emission correction curve was subsequently used for the determination of the corrected emission spectra of three test dyes, X, QS, and Y, revealing an average accuracy of 6.8% for the corrected emission spectra. This compares well with the relative standard uncertainties of 4.2% for physical standard-based spectral corrections demonstrated in the first part of this study (previous paper in this issue) involving an international group of four expert laboratories. The excellent comparability of the measurements of the field laboratories also demonstrates the effectiveness of RM-based correction procedures.

摘要

在这篇关于校正发射光谱最新技术可比性的两部分系列文章的第二部分中,我们通过涉及 12 个基于其荧光测量设备随机选择的现场实验室,将这一评估扩展到更广泛的荧光光谱学家群体中。这些实验室根据涉及常规测量条件的标准操作程序,使用市售光谱荧光标准对参考物质 (RM) 进行荧光计校准,并使用由联邦材料研究与测试研究所 (BAM) 开发并提供的数据评估软件 LINKCORR。随后,使用该仪器特定的发射校正曲线来确定三种测试染料 X、QS 和 Y 的校正发射光谱,结果表明校正发射光谱的平均精度为 6.8%。这与第一部分研究(本期的上一篇论文)中涉及四个国际专家实验室的基于物理标准的光谱校正的相对标准不确定度 4.2%相当。现场实验室测量的极好可比性也证明了基于 RM 的校正程序的有效性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验