Suppr超能文献

运用德尔菲法确定评估院前创伤护理的标准。

The identification of criteria to evaluate prehospital trauma care using the Delphi technique.

作者信息

Rosengart Matthew R, Nathens Avery B, Schiff Melissa A

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.

出版信息

J Trauma. 2007 Mar;62(3):708-13. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000197150.07714.c2.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Current trauma system performance improvement emphasizes hospital- and patient-based outcome measures such as mortality and morbidity, with little focus upon the processes of prehospital trauma care. Little data exist to suggest which prehospital criteria should serve as potential filters. This study identifies the most important filters for auditing prehospital trauma care using a Delphi technique to achieve consensus of expert opinion.

METHODS

Experts in trauma care from the United States (n = 81) were asked to generate filters of potential utility in monitoring the prehospital aspect of the trauma system, and were then required to rank these questions in order of importance to identify those of greatest importance.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight filters ranking in the highest tertile are proposed. The majority (54%) pertains to aspects of emergency medical services, which comprise 7 of the top 10 (70%) filters. Triage filters follow in priority ranking, comprising 29% of the final list. Filters concerning interfacility transfers and transportation ranked lowest.

CONCLUSION

This study identifies audit filters representing the most important aspects of prehospital trauma care that merit continued evaluation and monitoring. A subsequent trial addressing the utility of these filters could potentially enhance the sensitivity of identifying deviations in prehospital care, standardize the performance improvement process, and translate into an improvement in patient care and outcome.

摘要

目的

当前创伤系统性能的改善侧重于以医院和患者为基础的结果指标,如死亡率和发病率,而很少关注院前创伤护理的过程。几乎没有数据表明哪些院前标准应作为潜在的筛选指标。本研究使用德尔菲技术确定用于审核院前创伤护理的最重要筛选指标,以达成专家意见的共识。

方法

邀请来自美国的81名创伤护理专家提出在监测创伤系统院前方面可能有用的筛选指标,然后要求他们按照重要性对这些问题进行排序,以确定最重要的指标。

结果

提出了排在最高三分位数的28个筛选指标。大多数(54%)与紧急医疗服务的各个方面有关,其中包括前10个(70%)筛选指标中的7个。分诊筛选指标在优先级排序中紧随其后,占最终列表的29%。有关机构间转运和运输的筛选指标排名最低。

结论

本研究确定了代表院前创伤护理最重要方面的审核筛选指标,值得持续评估和监测。后续针对这些筛选指标效用的试验可能会提高识别院前护理偏差的敏感性,规范性能改进过程,并转化为患者护理和结果的改善。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验