McConnell Alison J, Yoo Daniel J, Zdero Rad, Schemitsch Emil H, McKee Michael D
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
J Orthop Trauma. 2007 Apr;21(4):248-53. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31803eb14e.
Three different methods of fixation used in acute disruption of the acromio-clavicular (AC) joint-namely, the coraco-clavicular Bosworth screw (CC Screw), a coraco-clavicular sling of Mersilene #5 tape (CC Sling), and a Hook Plate-were compared to baseline to see which could most closely replicate the stiffness of healthy cadaveric AC specimens (Intact).
It is hypothesized that the Hook Plate method, as compared with the other reconstructions tested, will be most similar mechanically to the intact AC joint with respect to present outcome measures.
Five matched pairs of fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens were tested. Stiffness was tested with superior cyclic loads to 70 N. The stiffness for each specimen was initially tested with all the ligaments in place (Intact). The AC and CC ligaments were then sectioned, and stiffness was tested, in varying order, with reconstructions using the CC Screw, the CC Sling, and the Hook Plate. Failure testing consisted of taking either the CC Screw or Hook Plate to failure within each matched pair.
The CC Screw and the CC Sling, respectively, showed stiffnesses of 46 +/- 23 N/mm and 15 +/- 8 N/mm, which was significantly different from the Intact specimen (P < 0.05). The Hook Plate had a stiffness of 26 +/- 17 N/mm, most comparable to the Intact joint stiffness of 25 +/- 8 N/mm (P = 0.785). With failure testing, the CC Screw failed at a significantly higher load than the Hook Plate (744 +/- 184 N vs 459 +/- 188 N) (P = 0.034).
The CC Screw demonstrated the greatest stiffness with repetitive loading to 70 N. The Hook Plate had a stiffness most similar to the normal physiologic state of the AC joint. The CC Sling was significantly less stiff than the Intact joint or the other methods of fixation.
Although the stiffest construct is the CC Screw, Hook Plate fixation allows physiologic motion without pathological deformation and most closely resembles the stiffness of the native AC joint for the current test procedure used.
比较三种用于肩锁关节急性脱位的不同固定方法,即喙锁博斯沃思螺钉(CC螺钉)、5号Mersilene带喙锁吊带(CC吊带)和钩钢板,与基线情况相比,看哪种方法能最接近地复制健康尸体肩锁关节标本(完整状态)的刚度。
假设与其他测试的重建方法相比,钩钢板方法在当前的结果测量方面在力学上与完整的肩锁关节最相似。
测试五对匹配的新鲜冷冻尸体标本。施加70 N的上肢循环载荷来测试刚度。每个标本的刚度最初在所有韧带完整的情况下(完整状态)进行测试。然后切断肩锁韧带和喙锁韧带,并以不同顺序使用CC螺钉、CC吊带和钩钢板进行重建来测试刚度。失效测试包括在每对匹配标本中使CC螺钉或钩钢板失效。
CC螺钉和CC吊带的刚度分别为46±23 N/mm和15±8 N/mm,与完整标本有显著差异(P<0.05)。钩钢板的刚度为26±17 N/mm,最接近完整关节的刚度25±8 N/mm(P = 0.785)。在失效测试中,CC螺钉在显著高于钩钢板的载荷下失效(744±184 N对459±188 N)(P = 0.034)。
CC螺钉在重复加载至70 N时表现出最大的刚度。钩钢板的刚度与肩锁关节的正常生理状态最相似。CC吊带的刚度明显低于完整关节或其他固定方法。
虽然最硬的结构是CC螺钉,但钩钢板固定允许生理运动而无病理变形,并且对于当前使用的测试程序,其最接近天然肩锁关节的刚度。