Suppr超能文献

急性重度肩锁关节脱位的手术治疗

Surgical treatment of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint dislocations.

作者信息

Marín Fermín Theodorakys, Hong Chih-Kai, Lacheta Lucca, Münch Lukas N, Beitzel Knut, Hurley Eoghan T, Hsu Kai-Lan, Brilakis Emmanouil, Bøe Berte, Cucchi Davide

机构信息

Clínica Santa Sofía Av. Principal de Santa Sofía El Cafetal Caracas Venezuela.

Thessaloniki Minimally Invasive Surgery (TheMIS) Orthopaedic Center St. Luke's Hospital Thessaloniki Panórama Greece.

出版信息

J Exp Orthop. 2025 Mar 10;12(1):e70173. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70173. eCollection 2025 Jan.

Abstract

Treatment options for acute acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) instability include several surgical and non-surgical approaches. Recent trends indicate a shift towards nonoperative treatment, even for severe Rockwood type V injuries, which traditionally required surgery. Despite this shift, some patients may still benefit from surgical stabilisation, particularly if significant pain and disability persist. Modern surgical techniques focus on cortical button systems and restoration of the coracoclavicular ligaments, emphasising the importance of the posterosuperior acromioclavicular capsuloligamentous complex in managing horizontal instability. Clavicular hook plates offer rigid stability but present risks, such as damage to the subacromial structures and acromial erosion. Although anatomical repair techniques have gained prominence due to their biomechanical advantages and have been endorsed by international societies, non-anatomic methods may also provide acceptable outcomes with lower costs. The use of tendon grafts in chronic ACJ instability has shown promise, although evidence for their use in acute cases remains limited. This review discusses various treatment strategies, including operative and nonoperative management, focusing on patient outcomes, complication rates, and return-to-sport scenarios. Ultimately, the choice between surgical and non-surgical treatment must consider individual patient needs and the potential for long-term recovery. : Not applicable.

摘要

急性肩锁关节(ACJ)不稳定的治疗选择包括多种手术和非手术方法。最近的趋势表明,即使对于传统上需要手术治疗的严重Rockwood V型损伤,也有向非手术治疗转变的趋势。尽管有这种转变,但一些患者可能仍能从手术稳定中获益,特别是如果严重疼痛和残疾持续存在。现代手术技术侧重于皮质纽扣系统和喙锁韧带的修复,强调后上肩锁关节囊韧带复合体在处理水平不稳定中的重要性。锁骨钩钢板提供刚性稳定性,但存在风险,如肩峰下结构损伤和肩峰侵蚀。尽管解剖修复技术因其生物力学优势而受到关注并得到国际学会的认可,但非解剖方法也可能以较低成本提供可接受的结果。在慢性ACJ不稳定中使用肌腱移植已显示出前景,尽管其在急性病例中的应用证据仍然有限。本综述讨论了各种治疗策略,包括手术和非手术管理,重点关注患者结果、并发症发生率和重返运动的情况。最终,手术和非手术治疗之间的选择必须考虑个体患者的需求和长期恢复的可能性。:不适用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b003/11892027/bd0d2b8d5202/JEO2-12-e70173-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验