Fuchs Manfred, Wagner Michael, Kastner Joern
Compumedics Neuroscan Germany GmbH, Hamburg, Germany.
J Clin Neurophysiol. 2007 Apr;24(2):101-19. doi: 10.1097/WNP.0b013e318038fb3e.
There is increasing interest in mapping and source reconstruction from electrocorticoencephalographic (ECoG) grid data and comparison to surface EEG evaluations of epileptic patients. ECoG mapping onto three-dimensional renderings of the individual cortical anatomy derived from magnetic resonance images and computed tomography (CT) is performed after coregistration of anatomical and functional coordinate systems. Source reconstructions from ECoG and EEG are compared using different source models and realistically shaped volume conductor models. Realistically shaped volume conductor models for EEG source reconstruction are a prerequisite for improved localization accuracy. Individual boundary element method (BEM) models derived from MRI represent the "gold standard" and can approximate isotropic homogeneous head compartments and thus give an improved description of the head shape as compared with classical oversimplifying spherical shell models. Anisotropic volume conduction properties of the bone layer or the white matter fibers can be described by the finite element method (FEM); unfortunately, these models require a huge computational effort and are thus not used in daily applications. To avoid this computational effort, head models derived from an averaged MRI dataset can be used. Highly refined models with a large number of nodes and thus better numerical accuracy can be used by this approach, because the setup is performed only once and the decomposed models or precomputed leadfield matrices are saved for later application. Individual image data are not at all needed, if an overlay of the reconstruction results with the anatomy is not desired. With precomputed leadfield matrices and linear interpolation techniques, at least standardized BEM and FEM volume conductor models derived from averaged MRI datasets can achieve the same computational speed as analytical spherical models. The smoothed cortical envelope is used as a realistically shaped single-shell volume conductor model for ECoG source reconstruction, whereas three-compartment BEM-models are required for EEG. The authors describe how to localize ECoG-grid electrode positions and how to segment the cortical surface from coregistered magnetic resonance and CT images. Landmark-based coregistration is performed using common fiducials in both image modalities. Another more promising automatic approach is based on mutual three-dimensional volume gray-level information. The ECoG electrode positions can be retrieved from three-dimensional CT slices manually using cursors in thresholded images with depth information. Alternatively, the smoothed envelope of the cortical surface segmented from the MRI is used to semiautomatically determine the grid electrode positions by marking the four corners and measuring distances along the smoothed surface. With extended source patches for cortically constrained scans and current density reconstructions, results from ECoG and surface EEG data were compared. Single equivalent dipoles were used to explain the EEG far fields, and results were compared with the original current density distributions explaining the ECoG data. The authors studied the performance of spherical and realistically shaped BEM volume conductor models for EEG and ECoG source reconstruction in spherical and nonspherical parts of the head with simulations and measured epileptic spike data. Only small differences between spherical and realistically shaped models were found in the spherical parts of the head, whereas realistically shaped models are superior to spherical approximations in both single-shell ECoG and three-shell EEG cases in the nonspherical parts, such as the temporal lobe areas. The ECoG near field is more complicated to interpret than the surface EEG far field and cannot be explained in general by simple equivalent dipoles. However, from simulations with realistically shaped volume conductor models and cortically constrained source models, the authors studied how the bone and skin layer act as spatial low pass filters that smooth and simplify the surface EEG maps generated by much more complicated-looking source configurations derived from measured ECoG data.
人们对从脑皮层电图(ECoG)网格数据进行映射和源重建以及与癫痫患者的头皮脑电图(EEG)评估进行比较的兴趣日益浓厚。在将解剖学和功能坐标系进行配准后,将ECoG映射到从磁共振图像和计算机断层扫描(CT)得出的个体皮质解剖结构的三维渲染图上。使用不同的源模型和逼真形状的容积导体模型来比较ECoG和EEG的源重建。用于EEG源重建的逼真形状的容积导体模型是提高定位准确性的前提条件。从MRI得出的个体边界元法(BEM)模型代表了“金标准”,并且可以近似各向同性均匀的头部隔室,因此与经典的过度简化的球壳模型相比,能更好地描述头部形状。骨层或白质纤维的各向异性容积传导特性可以用有限元法(FEM)来描述;不幸的是,这些模型需要巨大的计算量,因此未用于日常应用中。为了避免这种计算量,可使用从平均MRI数据集得出的头部模型。通过这种方法可以使用具有大量节点因而具有更好数值精度的高度精细模型,因为设置仅执行一次,并且分解后的模型或预计算的导联场矩阵会保存起来以供以后使用。如果不希望将重建结果与解剖结构叠加,那么根本不需要个体图像数据。利用预计算的导联场矩阵和线性插值技术,至少从平均MRI数据集得出的标准化BEM和FEM容积导体模型可以实现与解析球模型相同的计算速度。平滑的皮质包络用作ECoG源重建的逼真形状的单壳容积导体模型,而EEG则需要三室BEM模型。作者描述了如何定位ECoG网格电极位置以及如何从配准的磁共振和CT图像中分割皮质表面。基于地标性的配准是在两种图像模态中使用共同的基准点来进行的。另一种更有前景的自动方法是基于相互的三维体灰度信息。可以在具有深度信息的阈值化图像中使用光标从三维CT切片中手动检索ECoG电极位置。或者,从MRI分割出的皮质表面的平滑包络用于通过标记四个角并沿着平滑表面测量距离来半自动确定网格电极位置。通过用于皮质约束扫描和电流密度重建的扩展源补丁,比较了ECoG和头皮EEG数据的结果。使用单个等效偶极子来解释EEG远场,并将结果与解释ECoG数据的原始电流密度分布进行比较。作者通过模拟和测量的癫痫棘波数据研究了球形和逼真形状的BEM容积导体模型在头部球形和非球形部分进行EEG和ECoG源重建的性能。在头部的球形部分,球形模型和逼真形状的模型之间仅发现很小的差异,而在非球形部分(如颞叶区域),在单壳ECoG和三壳EEG情况下,逼真形状的模型都优于球形近似。ECoG近场比头皮EEG远场更难解释,并且一般不能用简单的等效偶极子来解释。然而,通过使用逼真形状的容积导体模型和皮质约束源模型进行模拟,作者研究了骨层和皮肤层如何作为空间低通滤波器,对由从测量的ECoG数据得出的看起来复杂得多的源配置所生成的头皮EEG图进行平滑和简化。