Nuñez Ponasso Guillermo, Wartman William A, McSweeney Ryan C, Lai Peiyao, Haueisen Jens, Maess Burkhard, Knösche Thomas R, Weise Konstantin, Noetscher Gregory M, Raij Tommi, Makaroff Sergey N
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA 01609, USA.
Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Informatics, Technische Universität Ilmenau, 98693 Ilmenau, Germany.
Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 Oct 26;11(11):1071. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11111071.
Electroencephalographic (EEG) source localization is a fundamental tool for clinical diagnoses and brain-computer interfaces. We investigate the impact of model complexity on reconstruction accuracy by comparing the widely used three-layer boundary element method (BEM) as an inverse method against a five-layer BEM accelerated by the fast multipole method (BEM-FMM) and coupled with adaptive mesh refinement (AMR) as forward solver. Modern BEM-FMM with AMR can solve high-resolution multi-tissue models efficiently and accurately. We generated noiseless 256-channel EEG data from 15 subjects in the Connectome Young Adult dataset, using four anatomically relevant dipole positions, three conductivity sets, and two head segmentations; we mapped localization errors across the entire grey matter from 4000 dipole positions. The average location error among our four selected dipoles is ∼5mm (±2mm) with an orientation error of ∼12∘ (±7∘). The average source localization error across the entire grey matter is ∼9mm (±4mm), with a tendency for smaller errors on the occipital lobe. Our findings indicate that while three-layer models are robust under noiseless conditions, substantial localization errors (10-20mm) are common. Therefore, models of five or more layers may be needed for accurate source reconstruction in critical applications involving noisy EEG data.
脑电图(EEG)源定位是临床诊断和脑机接口的一项基本工具。我们通过将广泛使用的三层边界元法(BEM)作为一种逆方法,与一种由快速多极子方法(BEM-FMM)加速并结合自适应网格细化(AMR)作为正解器的五层BEM进行比较,来研究模型复杂度对重建精度的影响。带有AMR的现代BEM-FMM能够高效且准确地求解高分辨率多组织模型。我们利用四个与解剖结构相关的偶极子位置、三组电导率以及两种头部分割方式,从连接组青年成人数据集中的15名受试者生成了无噪声的256通道EEG数据;我们从4000个偶极子位置绘制了整个灰质上的定位误差。我们所选的四个偶极子之间的平均位置误差约为5毫米(±2毫米),方向误差约为12°(±7°)。整个灰质上的平均源定位误差约为9毫米(±4毫米),枕叶上的误差有较小的趋势。我们的研究结果表明,虽然三层模型在无噪声条件下很稳健,但较大的定位误差(10 - 20毫米)很常见。因此,在涉及有噪声EEG数据的关键应用中,可能需要五层或更多层的模型来进行准确的源重建。