Choufani Georges, Roper Nicolas, Delbrouck Carine, Hassid Sergio, Gabius Hans-Joachim
Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Cliniques Universitaires de Bruxelles, Hôpuital Erasme, Brussels, Belgium.
Laryngoscope. 2007 Apr;117(4):706-11. doi: 10.1097/mlg.0b013e318031d09d.
Cholesteatoma is a benign tumor of the middle ear characterized by an aggressive and invasive potential. The only current treatment being surgery, it is important to have access to a reliable animal model to study and better understand cholesteatoma pathogenesis. Our study aimed to examine the biological validity of the most common experimental model of cholesteatoma: the Mongolian gerbil.
We have induced cholesteatoma by surgical ligature of the gerbil's external auditory duct. Quantitative comparison of eight biological markers involved in inflammation (macrophage migration inhibitory factor [MIF]), cell differentiation (retinoic acid receptors-alpha, -beta, and -gamma), and cell adhesion/apoptosis (galectins-1, -3, -7, and -8). The immunohistochemical staining was quantified by computer-assisted microscopy.
Two immunohistochemical parameters were determined in sections. The labeling index (LI) represents the percentage of tissue area specifically stained, and the mean optical density (MOD) denotes the staining intensity index. The LI reveals statistically significant differences for each marker tested. The MOD also shows statistically significant differences except for MIF (P = .259).
From the panel of markers, the majority of staining parameters was statistically significantly different between sections of the animal model and clinical specimen. These data do not support the concept of complete validity of the popular animal model.
胆脂瘤是一种具有侵袭性和浸润性潜能的中耳良性肿瘤。目前唯一的治疗方法是手术,因此获得可靠的动物模型来研究和更好地理解胆脂瘤发病机制很重要。我们的研究旨在检验最常见的胆脂瘤实验模型——蒙古沙鼠的生物学有效性。
我们通过手术结扎沙鼠的外耳道来诱导胆脂瘤形成。对参与炎症反应(巨噬细胞移动抑制因子[MIF])、细胞分化(视黄酸受体α、β和γ)以及细胞黏附/凋亡(半乳糖凝集素-1、-3、-7和-8)的8种生物标志物进行定量比较。免疫组织化学染色通过计算机辅助显微镜进行定量分析。
在切片中确定了两个免疫组织化学参数。标记指数(LI)代表特异性染色的组织面积百分比,平均光密度(MOD)表示染色强度指数。对于所测试的每种标志物,LI显示出统计学上的显著差异。除MIF外(P = 0.259),MOD也显示出统计学上的显著差异。
在所检测的标志物中,动物模型切片与临床标本切片之间的大多数染色参数存在统计学上的显著差异。这些数据不支持这种常用动物模型完全有效的观点。