• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Test-retest variability in visual field testing using frequency doubling technology.

作者信息

Horani A, Frenkel S, Blumenthal E Z

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Hadassah University Hospital, and Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem 91120, Israel.

出版信息

Eur J Ophthalmol. 2007 Mar-Apr;17(2):203-7. doi: 10.1177/112067210701700209.

DOI:10.1177/112067210701700209
PMID:17415693
Abstract

PURPOSE

To quantify the magnitude of test-retest variability (TRV) for normal subjects in serial visual fields (VF) using the frequency doubling technology (FDT) instrument.

METHODS

Twenty-one healthy adults, aged 23 to 60 years, underwent four serial FDT VF tests, using the full-threshold C-20 program of the Zeiss-Humphrey FDT analyzer, on one randomly chosen eye. The VF tests were spaced 2 to 4 days apart. All subjects performed two preliminary FDT tests in order to minimize any learning effect. Test-retest variability was calculated as the standard deviation of each location's sensitivity value across the four VF tests.

RESULTS

Mean TRV (+/-SD) for the entire field was 2.44+/-1.32 dB. Mean TRV (+/-SD) for the superior, inferior, nasal, and temporal hemifields were 2.48+/-1.3, 2.40+/-1.4, 2.40+/-1.3, and 2.48+/-1.3 dB, respectively. Mean TRV (+/-SD) for the foveal location, the 4 central, and the 12 peripheral locations were 2.49+/-1.4, 2.16+/-1.2, and 2.54+/-1.4 dB, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

TRV was found to be rather uniform across the visual field of the commercially available FDT device, with only a mild, clinically insignificant, effect of both eccentricity and age on TRV. Variability in the FDT VF, for normal subjects, was found to be more uniform than that of both standard and short wavelength automated perimetry. In addition, a strong inverse correlation was found, in normal subjects, between the mean sensitivity and TRV.

摘要

相似文献

1
Test-retest variability in visual field testing using frequency doubling technology.
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2007 Mar-Apr;17(2):203-7. doi: 10.1177/112067210701700209.
2
Evaluating several sources of variability for standard and SWAP visual fields in glaucoma patients, suspects, and normals.评估青光眼患者、疑似患者和正常人标准视野及SWAP视野的多种变异性来源。
Ophthalmology. 2003 Oct;110(10):1895-902. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00541-4.
3
The learning effect in visual field testing of healthy subjects using frequency doubling technology.使用频率加倍技术对健康受试者进行视野测试的学习效应。
J Glaucoma. 2002 Dec;11(6):511-6. doi: 10.1097/00061198-200212000-00011.
4
Learning effect and test-retest variability of pulsar perimetry.脉冲星视野计的学习效应和复测变异性。
J Glaucoma. 2013 Mar;22(3):230-7. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e318237bfe7.
5
Performance of frequency-doubling technology perimetry in a population-based prevalence survey of glaucoma: the Tajimi study.基于人群的青光眼患病率调查中倍频技术视野检查的表现:田美研究
Ophthalmology. 2007 Jan;114(1):27-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.06.041. Epub 2006 Oct 27.
6
Test-retest variability in glaucoma patients tested with C-20-1 screening-mode frequency doubling technology perimetry.采用C-20-1筛查模式频率加倍技术视野检查法对青光眼患者进行重测的变异性。
J Glaucoma. 2004 Aug;13(4):273-7. doi: 10.1097/00061198-200408000-00003.
7
Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.青光眼患者中矩阵频率加倍技术和标准自动视野计的阈值及变异性特征
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 Jul;46(7):2451-7. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-0135.
8
Learning effects among perimetric novices in frequency doubling technology perimetry.频率加倍技术视野检查中视野检查新手的学习效应
Ophthalmology. 2002 Apr;109(4):757-60. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(01)01002-8.
9
Test-retest variability of frequency-doubling perimetry and conventional perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal subjects.青光眼患者和正常受试者中倍频视野检查和传统视野检查的重测变异性。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999 Mar;40(3):648-56.
10
Comparison of long-term variability for standard and short-wavelength automated perimetry in stable glaucoma patients.稳定型青光眼患者标准视野检查与短波长自动视野检查的长期变异性比较。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2000 Mar;129(3):309-13. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(99)00432-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Case Report: Reversal and subsequent return of optic disc cupping in a myocilin (MYOC) gene-associated severe Juvenile Open-Angle Glaucoma (JOAG) patient.病例报告:一名与肌纤蛋白(MYOC)基因相关的重度青少年开角型青光眼(JOAG)患者视盘杯状凹陷的逆转及随后恢复情况
F1000Res. 2022 Nov 22;11:1361. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.127871.1. eCollection 2022.
2
Structure-Function Relationship in Glaucoma Patients With Parafoveal Versus Peripheral Nasal Scotoma.青光眼患者中黄斑旁与周边鼻侧暗点的结构-功能关系
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016 Feb;57(2):420-8. doi: 10.1167/iovs.15-18256.
3
Choice of Stimulus Range and Size Can Reduce Test-Retest Variability in Glaucomatous Visual Field Defects.
刺激范围和大小的选择可降低青光眼视野缺损的重测变异性。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2014 Sep 25;3(5):6. doi: 10.1167/tvst.3.5.6. eCollection 2014 Sep.