• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[Comment about the policy statement of the MDS. A position statement of the assessment group of the University Witten/Herdecke with regard to nursing documentation].

作者信息

Bartholomeyczik Sabine, Halek Margareta, Hunstein Dirk, Isfort Michael, Roser Jens-Martin, Hebart-Herrmann Maria, Bernhard Flora, Schreier Maria-Magdalena, Cramer Henning, Wagner Antje

机构信息

Private Universität Witten/Herdecke gGmbH, Lehrstuhl für Epidemiologie-Pflegewissenschaft, Witten.

出版信息

Pflege Z. 2007 Mar;60(3):145-9.

PMID:17416183
Abstract

In 2005 the Medical Advisory Service of Social Health Insurance (MDS) in Germany published a policy statement with regard to the nursing process and documentation. According to the intention of the association, this statement should be considered as recommendations which are able to improve nursing practice and to contribute to streamlining of bureaucracy in nursing care. Recognising the broad impact of this publication on nursing institutions, a working group on nursing assessment of the University Witten/Herdecke conducted a critical review of the statement. Significant criteria for evaluation were the primary role of nursing documentation, quality requirements for the documentation as well as recent scientific results concerning the implementation of nursing process and assessment-based nursing diagnoses. The review revealed that the statement lacks of a clear rationale and its content appears to be merely research-based. Therefore it has to be questioned if the publication will accomplish the claimed effects. In fact, future quality criteria for health care are to be developed independently on the basis of scientific results and in consideration of the experiences of all concerned social groups.

摘要

相似文献

1
[Comment about the policy statement of the MDS. A position statement of the assessment group of the University Witten/Herdecke with regard to nursing documentation].
Pflege Z. 2007 Mar;60(3):145-9.
2
Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.德国药品效益评估的程序和方法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5.
3
[Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].[德国药品效益评估的程序和方法]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008 Dec;133 Suppl 7:S225-46. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1100954. Epub 2008 Nov 25.
4
Putting policy into practice: pre- and posttests of implementing standardized languages for nursing documentation.将政策付诸实践:实施护理文件标准化语言的前后测试
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Oct;16(10):1826-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.01836.x.
5
[Process oriented nursing documentation in ambulatory care nursing--1: Learning through mistakes].
Pflege Z. 2009 Aug;62(8):477-80.
6
Structure and content in Norwegian nursing care documentation.挪威护理文件中的结构与内容。
Scand J Caring Sci. 1999;13(1):18-25.
7
[Computerized standard report for MDK (Medical Service of Public Health Insurance) evaluation of inpatient geriatric nursing: the initial overview].[医疗保险老年住院护理MDK(医疗服务)评估的计算机化标准报告:初步概述]
Pflege Z. 2009 Jun;62(6):337-41.
8
[Critical comment on nursing expert standards: meeting challenges to improve quality].
Pflege Z. 2006 Jan;59(1):34-8.
9
[DRG--nursing diagnoses as an opportunity].
Krankenpfl Soins Infirm. 2009;102(11):18-21.
10
Prevalence of accurate nursing documentation in patient records.患者病历中准确护理记录的流行情况。
J Adv Nurs. 2010 Nov;66(11):2481-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05433.x. Epub 2010 Aug 23.