Suppr超能文献

使用或不使用奥曲肽进行硬化治疗急性静脉曲张出血。

Sclerotherapy with or without octreotide for acute variceal bleeding.

作者信息

Besson I, Ingrand P, Person B, Boutroux D, Heresbach D, Bernard P, Hochain P, Larricq J, Gourlaouen A, Ribard D

机构信息

Service d'Hépatogastroentérologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, France.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 1995 Aug 31;333(9):555-60. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199508313330904.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sclerotherapy is considered the most effective way to stop bleeding from esophageal varices, but acute variceal bleeding is still associated with a high risk of rebleeding and death. We compared sclerotherapy alone with sclerotherapy and octreotide to control acute variceal bleeding and prevent early rebleeding in patients with cirrhosis.

METHODS

In a double-blind, prospective trial, 199 patients with cirrhosis and acute variceal bleeding who underwent emergency sclerotherapy were randomly assigned to receive a continuous infusion of octreotide (25 micrograms per hour) or placebo for five days. The primary outcome measure was survival without rebleeding five days after sclerotherapy.

RESULTS

After five days, the proportion of patients who had survived without rebleeding was higher in the octreotide group (85 of 98 patients, or 87 percent) than in the placebo group (72 of 101, or 71 percent; 95 percent confidence interval for the difference, 4 to 27 percent; P = 0.009). The mean number of units of blood transfused within the first 24 hours after sclerotherapy was lower in the octreotide group (1.2 units; range, 0 to 7) than in the placebo group (2.0 units; range, 0 to 10; P = 0.006). A logistic-regression analysis showed that the treatment assignment (P = 0.003) and the number of blood units transfused before any other treatment was undertaken (P = 0.002) were the only two variables independently associated with survival without rebleeding. After adjustment for base-line differences between the two groups, the odds ratio for treatment failure in the placebo group, as compared with the octreotide group, was 3.3 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.5 to 7.3). The mean (+/- SD) 15-day cumulative survival rate (estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method) was 88 +/- 12 percent in both groups. Side effects were minor, and their incidence was similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with cirrhosis, the combination of sclerotherapy and octreotide is more effective than sclerotherapy alone in controlling acute variceal bleeding, but there is no difference between the overall mortality rates associated with the two approaches to treatment.

摘要

背景

硬化疗法被认为是阻止食管静脉曲张出血的最有效方法,但急性静脉曲张出血仍与再出血和死亡的高风险相关。我们比较了单纯硬化疗法与硬化疗法联合奥曲肽在控制肝硬化患者急性静脉曲张出血及预防早期再出血方面的效果。

方法

在一项双盲、前瞻性试验中,199例接受急诊硬化疗法的肝硬化急性静脉曲张出血患者被随机分配接受持续输注奥曲肽(每小时25微克)或安慰剂,持续5天。主要结局指标是硬化疗法后5天无再出血存活。

结果

5天后,奥曲肽组无再出血存活的患者比例(98例中的85例,即87%)高于安慰剂组(101例中的72例,即71%;两组差异的95%置信区间为4%至27%;P = 0.009)。硬化疗法后首24小时内奥曲肽组的平均输血量(1.2单位;范围为0至7单位)低于安慰剂组(2.0单位;范围为0至10单位;P = 0.006)。逻辑回归分析显示,治疗分组(P = 0.003)和在采取任何其他治疗前的输血量(P = 0.002)是与无再出血存活独立相关的仅有的两个变量。在对两组基线差异进行调整后,与奥曲肽组相比,安慰剂组治疗失败的比值比为3.3(95%置信区间为1.5至7.3)。两组的平均(±标准差)15天累积生存率(采用Kaplan-Meier法估算)均为88±12%。副作用轻微,两组发生率相似。

结论

对于肝硬化患者,硬化疗法联合奥曲肽在控制急性静脉曲张出血方面比单纯硬化疗法更有效,但两种治疗方法的总体死亡率无差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验