• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项综合方法的心理测量分析建议对多维健康控制点量表进行修改。

A combined-method psychometric analysis recommended modification of the multidimensional health locus of control scales.

作者信息

Kelly P A, Kallen M A, Suárez-Almazor M E

机构信息

Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, and Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 May;60(5):440-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.08.005. Epub 2006 Dec 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.08.005
PMID:17419954
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Multidimensional Health Locus of Control (MHLC) scales are widely used to measure beliefs about determinants of persons' health. We evaluated the scales over the largest-ever disease-specific sample of subjects using a combined-method psychometric approach.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

We performed a secondary analysis of data from 1,206 subjects from three osteoarthritis studies, using Rasch analysis and confirmatory factor analysis simultaneously. Differential item functioning (DIF) by gender and data source, scale dimensionality, and item fit were examined. The Rasch model fit the data if Rasch residual principal components analysis (PCA) corroborated three distinct dimensions and item fit statistics fell between 0.80 and 1.20. The confirmatory factor (CFA) model fit the data if factor loadings exceeded 0.50 for all items.

RESULTS

DIF by gender or data source was not materially evident for any items. PCA supported existence of three dimensions in the data. Both Rasch and CFA models fit the data for 16 items; two items were detected as misperforming. When these items were removed, fit of both models improved.

CONCLUSION

Results of this large-sample evaluation of the MHLC scales corroborated earlier findings that removal of certain items improves the scales. The combined Rasch-CFA approach provided better insight to scale performance problems than either method alone provided.

摘要

目的

多维健康控制点(MHLC)量表被广泛用于衡量人们对健康决定因素的信念。我们使用综合方法的心理测量方法,在有史以来最大的特定疾病样本受试者中对这些量表进行了评估。

研究设计与设置

我们对来自三项骨关节炎研究的1206名受试者的数据进行了二次分析,同时使用了拉施分析和验证性因素分析。检查了按性别和数据源划分的项目功能差异(DIF)、量表维度和项目拟合情况。如果拉施残差主成分分析(PCA)证实存在三个不同维度且项目拟合统计量在0.80至1.20之间,则拉施模型适合该数据。如果所有项目的因子载荷超过0.50,则验证性因子(CFA)模型适合该数据。

结果

任何项目按性别或数据源划分均未明显存在项目功能差异。PCA支持数据中存在三个维度。拉施模型和CFA模型对16个项目的数据均拟合良好;检测到两个项目表现不佳。去除这些项目后,两个模型的拟合度均有所提高。

结论

本次对MHLC量表的大样本评估结果证实了早期的研究发现,即去除某些项目可改善量表。与单独使用任何一种方法相比,拉施分析与CFA相结合的方法能更好地洞察量表性能问题。

相似文献

1
A combined-method psychometric analysis recommended modification of the multidimensional health locus of control scales.一项综合方法的心理测量分析建议对多维健康控制点量表进行修改。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 May;60(5):440-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.08.005. Epub 2006 Dec 11.
2
The psychometric validity of the NEI VFQ-25 for use in a low-vision population.用于低视力人群的 NEI VFQ-25 的心理测量学效度。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010 Jun;51(6):2878-84. doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-4494. Epub 2010 Jan 20.
3
Factor structure and dimensionality of the multidimensional health locus of control scales in measuring adults with epilepsy.多维健康控制点量表在测量癫痫成年患者时的因子结构与维度
J Outcome Meas. 1998;2(3):173-90.
4
The impact of vision impairment questionnaire: an assessment of its domain structure using confirmatory factor analysis and rasch analysis.视力损害问卷的影响:使用验证性因素分析和拉施分析对其领域结构进行评估。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007 Mar;48(3):1001-6. doi: 10.1167/iovs.06-0361.
5
Internal construct validity of the Oxford Knee Scale: evidence from Rasch measurement.牛津膝关节量表的内部结构效度:来自拉施测量的证据。
Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Dec 15;57(8):1363-7. doi: 10.1002/art.23091.
6
A longitudinal evaluation of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression scale (CES-D) in a rheumatoid arthritis population using Rasch analysis.使用拉施分析对类风湿性关节炎人群中的流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)进行纵向评估。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007 Jul 13;5:41. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-5-41.
7
The Impact of Vision Impairment Questionnaire: an evaluation of its measurement properties using Rasch analysis.视力损害问卷的影响:使用拉施分析对其测量属性的评估。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006 Nov;47(11):4732-41. doi: 10.1167/iovs.06-0220.
8
Evaluation of the structure of Brazilian State-Trait Anxiety Inventory using a Rasch psychometric approach.采用 Rasch 心理计量学方法评价巴西状态-特质焦虑量表的结构。
J Psychosom Res. 2010 Mar;68(3):223-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.09.013. Epub 2009 Dec 9.
9
Is health locus of control a 3-factor or a 2-factor construct?健康控制点是一个三因素结构还是两因素结构?
J Clin Psychol. 1996 Sep;52(5):559-68. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4679(199609)52:5<559::AID-JCLP11>3.0.CO;2-D.
10
Using the Rasch model in nursing research: an introduction and illustrative example.护理研究中Rasch模型的应用:介绍与示例
Int J Nurs Stud. 2009 Mar;46(3):380-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2008.10.007. Epub 2008 Dec 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of Online Classroom Learning Environment Inventory (OCLEI): The case of Indonesia during the COVID-19 pandemic.在线课堂学习环境量表(OCLEI)的开发与验证:以印度尼西亚在新冠疫情期间的情况为例
Learn Environ Res. 2022;25(1):97-113. doi: 10.1007/s10984-021-09352-3. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
2
Patient-Reported Social and Behavioral Determinants of Health and Estimated Risk of Hospitalization in High-Risk Veterans Affairs Patients.高危退伍军人事务患者的患者报告社会和行为健康决定因素及住院估计风险。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Oct 1;3(10):e2021457. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.21457.
3
Confirmatory factor analysis and invariance testing between Blacks and Whites of the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control scale.
多维健康控制点量表在黑人和白人之间的验证性因素分析及恒等性检验。
Health Psychol Open. 2015 Nov 17;2(2):2055102915615045. doi: 10.1177/2055102915615045. eCollection 2015 Jul.
4
A revision of the quality of life-breast cancer survivors (QOL-BCS) instrument.乳腺癌幸存者生活质量(QOL-BCS)量表的修订版。
Res Nurs Health. 2013 Aug;36(4):423-34. doi: 10.1002/nur.21541. Epub 2013 Mar 19.
5
Multiple dimensions of health locus of control in a representative population sample: ordinal factor analysis and cross-validation of an existing three and a new four factor model.代表性人群样本中健康控制源的多个维度:现有三因素和新四因素模型的有序因子分析和交叉验证。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 Aug 12;11:114. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-114.