Jim G K, Booker C W, Guichon P T
Can Vet J. 1992 Apr;33(4):245-50.
A field trial was performed to compare trimethoprim-sulfadoxine to ceftiofur sodium in the treatment of bovine respiratory disease (BRD) in feedlot calves. Five-hundred-and-fifty-five recently weaned, crossbred beef calves, with naturally occurring cases of BRD, were randomly assigned to either trimethoprim-sulfadoxine or ceftiofur sodium treatment groups. The effectiveness of the antibiotics was assessed by comparing relapse rates, three day treatment response rates, mortality rates, chronicity rates, and wastage rates. There was no statistical difference in the first or second relapse rates between the two groups. For the initial therapy, first relapses, and overall treatment episodes, a significantly greater proportion of the calves treated with ceftiofur sodium responded to three days of therapy than those treated with trimethoprim-sulfadoxine (p < 0.05). This resulted in a 10% reduction in treatment costs for calves in the ceftiofur group. There were significantly lower mortality and wastage rates attributable to BRD in the ceftiofur sodium group than in the trimethoprim-sulfadoxine group (p < 0.05). However, there were no significant differences in overall mortality, overall chronicity, or overall wastage rates between the treatment groups.
进行了一项田间试验,以比较甲氧苄啶-磺胺多辛与头孢噻呋钠在育肥牛犊牛呼吸道疾病(BRD)治疗中的效果。555头近期断奶的杂交肉牛犊,患有自然发生的BRD病例,被随机分配到甲氧苄啶-磺胺多辛或头孢噻呋钠治疗组。通过比较复发率、三天治疗反应率、死亡率、慢性率和损耗率来评估抗生素的有效性。两组之间的首次或第二次复发率没有统计学差异。对于初始治疗、首次复发和总体治疗情况,接受头孢噻呋钠治疗的犊牛中,对三天治疗有反应的比例显著高于接受甲氧苄啶-磺胺多辛治疗的犊牛(p < 0.05)。这使得头孢噻呋组犊牛的治疗成本降低了10%。头孢噻呋钠组因BRD导致的死亡率和损耗率显著低于甲氧苄啶-磺胺多辛组(p < 0.05)。然而,治疗组之间的总体死亡率、总体慢性率或总体损耗率没有显著差异。