Ranson R, Igarashi H, MacGregor E A, Wilkinson M
City of London Migraine Clinic.
Cephalalgia. 1991 Sep;11(4):189-92. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-2982.1991.1104189.x.
A preliminary study was undertaken to provide clinical evidence to support the hypothesis that: "Migraine with aura, migraine without aura and aura alone are the same condition, which differ in degree rather than pathophysiology." At the City of London Migraine Clinic, 50 patients consecutively attending the clinic with a past or present history of migraine with aura were questioned. Of the 50 patients questioned 36 (70%) had a combination of migraine with aura, migraine without aura and/or aura alone; i.e. 70% had had more than one type of migraine attack. The duration, severity and frequency of attacks did not differ between migraine with and migraine without aura. Conclusion--the results support the hypothesis that migraine with and migraine without aura, and aura alone are not separate conditions, because: (1) most patients suffer from more than one type of migraine attack; (2) there are no significant differences in the characteristics of the migraine attacks in the different groups; (3) there are no significant differences in the characteristics of the subjects.
开展了一项初步研究,以提供临床证据支持以下假设:“伴先兆偏头痛、无先兆偏头痛和单纯先兆是同一病症,只是程度不同而非病理生理不同。”在伦敦市偏头痛诊所,对连续就诊的50例有既往或当前伴先兆偏头痛病史的患者进行了询问。在接受询问的50例患者中,36例(70%)有伴先兆偏头痛、无先兆偏头痛和/或单纯先兆的组合情况;即70%的患者有不止一种类型的偏头痛发作。伴先兆偏头痛和无先兆偏头痛发作的持续时间、严重程度和频率并无差异。结论——结果支持以下假设,即伴先兆偏头痛、无先兆偏头痛和单纯先兆并非独立病症,原因如下:(1)大多数患者患有不止一种类型的偏头痛发作;(2)不同组中偏头痛发作的特征无显著差异;(3)受试者的特征无显著差异。