Suppr超能文献

监管机构的决策:它们是基于证据的吗?

Decisions by regulatory agencies: are they evidence-based?

作者信息

Furberg Curt D

机构信息

Division of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157-1063, USA.

出版信息

Trials. 2007 Apr 11;8:13. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-8-13.

Abstract

Contradictory statements about the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs from the European Medicines Agency and the United States Food and Drug Administration have raised questions about whether regulatory decisions are evidence-based. For the selective COX-2 inhibitors, there are clear contraindications and warnings in Europe, but only a vaguely worded Black Box warning in the United States. All the non-selective agents are given an almost "clean bill of health" in Europe, while all of them are judged to have a similar risk-benefit ratio as celecoxib in the United States. The regulatory agencies have failed to recognize the clinical trial evidence that the risk of cardiovascular events varies substantially among the non-selective agents, with diclofenac carrying the highest risk of harm.

摘要

欧洲药品管理局和美国食品药品监督管理局关于非甾体抗炎药的相互矛盾的声明引发了人们对监管决策是否基于证据的质疑。对于选择性环氧化酶-2抑制剂,在欧洲有明确的禁忌和警告,但在美国只有措辞模糊的黑框警告。在欧洲,所有非选择性药物几乎都被给予了“健康清白证明”,而在美国,所有这些药物都被判定与塞来昔布具有相似的风险效益比。监管机构未能认识到临床试验证据表明,非选择性药物中心血管事件的风险差异很大,双氯芬酸造成伤害的风险最高。

相似文献

5
Celecoxib still on the market: but for whose benefit?
Prescrire Int. 2005 Oct;14(79):177-8.
7
4 years after withdrawal of rofecoxib: where do we stand today?罗非昔布撤市4年后:我们如今处于什么状况?
Rheumatol Int. 2008 Oct;28(12):1187-95. doi: 10.1007/s00296-008-0650-4. Epub 2008 Jul 29.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验