Gunter B R, Butler K A, Wallace R L, Smith S M, Harirforoosh S
Gatton College of Pharmacy, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, USA.
Quillen College of Medicine Library, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, USA.
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2017 Feb;42(1):27-38. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12484. Epub 2016 Dec 26.
Although non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been studied in randomized, controlled trials and meta-analyses in an effort to determine their cardiovascular (CV) risks, no consensus has been reached. These studies continue to raise questions, including whether cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) selectivity plays a role in conferring CV risk. We performed a meta-analysis of current literature to determine whether COX-2 selectivity leads to an increased CV risk.
We utilized randomized, controlled trials and prospective cohort studies. We selected eight NSAIDs based on popularity and COX selectivity and conducted a search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. Primary endpoints included any myocardial infarction (MI), any stroke, CV death, and a combination of all three (composite CV outcomes). Twenty-six studies were found that met inclusion and exclusion criteria. Comparisons were made between all included drugs, against placebo, and against non-selective NSAIDs (nsNSAIDs). Drugs were also compared against COX-2 selective inhibitors (COXIBs) with and without inclusion of rofecoxib.
Incidence of MI was increased by rofecoxib in all comparison categories [all NSAIDs (OR: 1·811, 95% CI: 1·379-2·378), placebo (OR: 1·655: 95% CI: 1·029-2·661), nsNSAIDs (OR: 2·155, 95% CI: 1·146-4·053), and COXIBs (OR: 1·800, 95% CI: 1·217-2·662)], but was decreased by celecoxib and naproxen in the COXIB comparison [(OR: 0·583, 95% CI: 0·396-0·857) and (OR: 0·609, 95% CI: 0·375-0·989, respectively]. Incidence of stroke was increased by rofecoxib in comparisons with all NSAIDs and other COXIBs [(OR: 1·488, 95% CI: 1·027-2·155) and (OR: 1·933, 95% CI: 1·052-3·549), respectively]. Incidence of stroke was decreased by celecoxib when compared with all NSAIDs, nsNSAIDs, and COXIBs [(OR: 0·603, 95% CI: 0·410-0·887), (OR: 0·517, 95% CI: 0·287-0·929), and (OR: 0·509, 95% CI: 0·280-0·925), respectively]. No NSAID reached statistical significance in regard to CV death. Incidence of the composite endpoint was increased by rofecoxib when compared against all NSAIDs, placebo, and other COXIBs [(OR: 1·612, 95% CI: 1·313-1·981), (OR: 1·572, 95% CI: 1·123-2·201) and (OR: 1·838, 95% CI: 1·323-2·554), respectively]. Incidence of composite endpoint was decreased by celecoxib in the all NSAIDs and COXIBs comparisons [(OR: 0·805, 95% CI: 0·658-0·986) and (OR: 0·557, 95% CI: 0.404-0.767), respectively]. When rofecoxib was removed from the COXIBs group, no difference was found with any comparison, suggesting rofecoxib skewed the data.
This instead of the meta-analysis suggests that COX-2 selectivity may not play a role in the CV risk of NSAIDs. Rofecoxib was the only drug to demonstrate harm and skewed the data of the COX-2 selective group.
尽管非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)已在随机对照试验和荟萃分析中进行了研究,以确定其心血管(CV)风险,但尚未达成共识。这些研究不断引发问题,包括环氧化酶-2(COX-2)选择性在赋予心血管风险方面是否起作用。我们对当前文献进行了荟萃分析,以确定COX-2选择性是否会导致心血管风险增加。
我们利用了随机对照试验和前瞻性队列研究。我们根据受欢迎程度和COX选择性选择了八种NSAIDs,并对MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane数据库进行了检索。主要终点包括任何心肌梗死(MI)、任何中风、心血管死亡以及所有三者的组合(复合心血管结局)。发现有26项研究符合纳入和排除标准。对所有纳入药物之间、与安慰剂以及与非选择性NSAIDs(nsNSAIDs)进行了比较。还将药物与COX-2选择性抑制剂(COXIBs)进行了比较,包括纳入罗非昔布和不纳入罗非昔布的情况。
在所有比较类别中,罗非昔布均增加了心肌梗死的发生率[所有NSAIDs(比值比:1.811,95%置信区间:1.379 - 2.378)、安慰剂(比值比:1.655,95%置信区间:1.029 - 2.661)、nsNSAIDs(比值比:2.155,95%置信区间:1.146 - 4.053)以及COXIBs(比值比:1.800,95%置信区间:1.217 - 2.662)],但在与COXIBs比较时,塞来昔布和萘普生降低了心肌梗死的发生率[(比值比:0.583,95%置信区间:0.396 - 0.857)和(比值比:0.609,95%置信区间:0.375 - 0.989)]。与所有NSAIDs和其他COXIBs比较时,罗非昔布增加了中风的发生率[(比值比:1.488,95%置信区间:1.027 - 2.155)和(比值比:1.933,95%置信区间:1.052 - 3.549)]。与所有NSAIDs、nsNSAIDs和COXIBs比较时,塞来昔布降低了中风的发生率[(比值比:0.603,95%置信区间:0.410 - 0.887)、(比值比:0.517,95%置信区间:0.287 - 0.929)和(比值比:0.509,95%置信区间:0.280 - 0.925)]。没有NSAID在心血管死亡方面达到统计学显著性。与所有NSAIDs、安慰剂和其他COXIBs比较时,罗非昔布增加了复合终点的发生率[(比值比:1.612,95%置信区间:1.313 - 1.981)、(比值比:1.572,95%置信区间:1.123 - 2.201)和(比值比:1.838,95%置信区间:1.323 - 2.554)]。在与所有NSAIDs和COXIBs比较时,塞来昔布降低了复合终点的发生率[(比值比:0.805,95%置信区间:0.658 - 0.986)和(比值比:0.557,95%置信区间:0.404 - 0.767)]。当从COXIBs组中去除罗非昔布时,任何比较均未发现差异,这表明罗非昔布使数据产生了偏差。
这项荟萃分析表明,COX-2选择性可能在NSAIDs的心血管风险中不起作用。罗非昔布是唯一显示有危害且使COX-2选择性组数据产生偏差的药物。