Kearney Patricia M, Baigent Colin, Godwin Jon, Halls Heather, Emberson Jonathan R, Patrono Carlo
Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF.
BMJ. 2006 Jun 3;332(7553):1302-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7553.1302.
To assess the effects of selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX 2) inhibitors and traditional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on the risk of vascular events.
Meta-analysis of published and unpublished tabular data from randomised trials, with indirect estimation of the effects of traditional NSAIDs.
Medline and Embase (January 1966 to April 2005); Food and Drug Administration records; and data on file from Novartis, Pfizer, and Merck.
Eligible studies were randomised trials that included a comparison of a selective COX 2 inhibitor versus placebo or a selective COX 2 inhibitor versus a traditional NSAID, of at least four weeks' duration, with information on serious vascular events (defined as myocardial infarction, stroke, or vascular death). Individual investigators and manufacturers provided information on the number of patients randomised, numbers of vascular events, and the person time of follow-up for each randomised group.
In placebo comparisons, allocation to a selective COX 2 inhibitor was associated with a 42% relative increase in the incidence of serious vascular events (1.2%/year v 0.9%/year; rate ratio 1.42, 95% confidence interval 1.13 to 1.78; P = 0.003), with no significant heterogeneity among the different selective COX 2 inhibitors. This was chiefly attributable to an increased risk of myocardial infarction (0.6%/year v 0.3%/year; 1.86, 1.33 to 2.59; P = 0.0003), with little apparent difference in other vascular outcomes. Among trials of at least one year's duration (mean 2.7 years), the rate ratio for vascular events was 1.45 (1.12 to 1.89; P = 0.005). Overall, the incidence of serious vascular events was similar between a selective COX 2 inhibitor and any traditional NSAID (1.0%/year v 0.9%/year; 1.16, 0.97 to 1.38; P = 0.1). However, statistical heterogeneity (P = 0.001) was found between trials of a selective COX 2 inhibitor versus naproxen (1.57, 1.21 to 2.03) and of a selective COX 2 inhibitor versus non-naproxen NSAIDs (0.88, 0.69 to 1.12). The summary rate ratio for vascular events, compared with placebo, was 0.92 (0.67 to 1.26) for naproxen, 1.51 (0.96 to 2.37) for ibuprofen, and 1.63 (1.12 to 2.37) for diclofenac.
Selective COX 2 inhibitors are associated with a moderate increase in the risk of vascular events, as are high dose regimens of ibuprofen and diclofenac, but high dose naproxen is not associated with such an excess.
评估选择性环氧化酶-2(COX 2)抑制剂和传统非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)对血管事件风险的影响。
对已发表和未发表的随机试验表格数据进行荟萃分析,间接估计传统NSAIDs的效果。
Medline和Embase(1966年1月至2005年4月);美国食品药品监督管理局记录;以及来自诺华、辉瑞和默克公司的存档数据。
符合条件的研究为随机试验,包括选择性COX 2抑制剂与安慰剂的比较,或选择性COX 2抑制剂与传统NSAIDs的比较,持续时间至少四周,有关于严重血管事件(定义为心肌梗死、中风或血管性死亡)的信息。个体研究者和制造商提供了每个随机分组的随机化患者数量、血管事件数量以及随访的人时数据。
在与安慰剂的比较中,分配到选择性COX 2抑制剂组与严重血管事件发生率相对增加42%相关(每年1.2%对每年0.9%;率比1.42,95%置信区间1.13至1.78;P = 0.003),不同的选择性COX 2抑制剂之间无显著异质性。这主要归因于心肌梗死风险增加(每年0.6%对每年0.3%;1.86,1.33至2.59;P = 0.0003),其他血管结局方面差异不明显。在至少为期一年(平均2.7年)的试验中,血管事件的率比为1.45(1.12至1.89;P = 0.005)。总体而言,选择性COX 2抑制剂与任何传统NSAIDs的严重血管事件发生率相似(每年1.0%对每年0.9%;1.16,0.97至1.38;P = 0.1)。然而,在选择性COX 2抑制剂与萘普生的试验(1.57,1.21至2.03)以及选择性COX 2抑制剂与非萘普生NSAIDs的试验(0.88,0.69至1.12)之间发现了统计学异质性(P = 0.001)。与安慰剂相比,萘普生的血管事件汇总率比为0.92(0.67至1.26),布洛芬为1.51(0.96至2.37),双氯芬酸为1.63(1.12至2.37)。
选择性COX 2抑制剂与血管事件风险适度增加相关,高剂量布洛芬和双氯芬酸方案也是如此,但高剂量萘普生与这种增加无关。