Chen Chia-Yang, Wen Tzu-Yao, Wang Gen-Shuh, Cheng Hui-Wen, Lin Ying-Hsuan, Lien Guang-Wen
Institute of Environmental Health, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, 17 Hsu-Chou Road, Taipei (10055), Taiwan.
Sci Total Environ. 2007 Jun 1;378(3):352-65. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.02.038. Epub 2007 Apr 10.
River water and wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) effluents from metropolitan Taipei, Taiwan were tested for the presence of the pollutants estrone (E1), estriol (E3), 17beta-estradiol (E2), and 17alpha-ethinylestradiol (EE2) using a new methodology that involves high-flow solid-phase extraction and liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. The method was also used to investigate the removal of the analytes by conventional drinking water treatment processes. Without adjusting the pH, we extracted 1-L samples with PolarPlus C18 Speedisks under a flow rate exceeding 100 mL/min, in which six samples could be done simultaneously using an extraction station. The adsorbent was washed with 40% methanol/60% water and then eluted by 50% methanol/50% dichloromethane. The eluate was concentrated until almost dry and was reconstituted by 20 microL of methanol. Quantitation was done by LC-MS/MS-negative electrospray ionization in the selected reaction monitoring mode with isotope-dilution techniques. The mobile phase was 10 mM N-methylmorpholine aqueous solution/acetonitrile with gradient elution. Mean recoveries of spiked Milli-Q water were 65-79% and precisions were within 2-20% of the tested concentrations (5.0-200 ng/L). The method was validated with spiked upstream river water; precisions were most within 10% of the tested concentrations (10-100 ng/L) with most RSDs<10%. LODs of the environmental matrixes were 0.78-7.65 ng/L. A pre-filtration step before solid-phase extraction may significantly influence the measurement of E1 and EE2 concentrations; disk overloading by water matrix may also impact analyte recoveries along with ion suppression. In the Taipei water study, the four steroid estrogens were detected in river samples (ca. 15 ng/L for E2 and EE2 and 35-45 ng/L for E1 and E3). Average levels of 19-26 ng/L for E1, E2, and EE2 were detected in most wastewater effluents, while only a single effluent sample contained E3. The higher level in the river was likely caused by the discharge of untreated human and farming waste into the water. In the drinking water treatment simulations, coagulation removed 20-50% of the estrogens. An increased dose of aluminum sulfate did not improve the performance. Despite the reactive phenolic moiety in the analytes, the steroids were decreased only 20-44% of the initial concentrations in pre- or post-chlorination. Rapid filtration, with crushed anthracite playing a major role, took out more than 84% of the estrogens. Except for E3, the whole procedure successfully removed most of the estrogens even if the initial concentration reached levels as high as 500 ng/L.
采用一种涉及高流量固相萃取和液相色谱/串联质谱法的新方法,对中国台湾台北市的河水及污水处理厂(WWTP)出水进行检测,以确定其中是否存在污染物雌酮(E1)、雌三醇(E3)、17β-雌二醇(E2)和17α-乙炔雌二醇(EE2)。该方法还用于研究常规饮用水处理工艺对这些分析物的去除效果。在不调节pH值的情况下,我们使用PolarPlus C18 Speedisks以超过100 mL/min的流速萃取1-L样品,借助萃取工作站可同时处理六个样品。用40%甲醇/60%水冲洗吸附剂,然后用50%甲醇/50%二氯甲烷洗脱。将洗脱液浓缩至近干,再用20 μL甲醇复溶。采用同位素稀释技术,在选择反应监测模式下通过液相色谱-串联质谱负离子电喷雾电离进行定量分析。流动相为10 mM N-甲基吗啉水溶液/乙腈,采用梯度洗脱。加标超纯水的平均回收率为65%-79%,精密度在测试浓度(5.0-200 ng/L)的2%-20%以内。该方法通过加标上游河水进行验证;精密度大多在测试浓度(10-100 ng/L)的10%以内,大多数相对标准偏差(RSD)<10%。环境基质的检测限为0.78-7.65 ng/L。固相萃取前的预过滤步骤可能会显著影响E1和EE2浓度的测定;水基质导致的圆盘过载也可能影响分析物回收率以及离子抑制。在台北市的水质研究中,在河水样本中检测到了四种甾体雌激素(E2和EE2约为15 ng/L,E1和E3为35-45 ng/L)。在大多数污水处理厂出水中检测到E1、E2和EE2的平均水平为19-26 ng/L,而只有一个出水样本含有E3。河水中较高的含量可能是由于未经处理的人类和农业废弃物排放到水中造成的。在饮用水处理模拟中,混凝去除了20%-50%的雌激素。增加硫酸铝的投加量并未改善处理效果。尽管分析物中存在具有反应性的酚基部分,但在预氯化或后氯化过程中,甾体仅降低了初始浓度的20%-44%。以碎无烟煤为主的快速过滤去除了超过84%的雌激素。除E3外,即使初始浓度高达500 ng/L,整个过程也成功去除了大部分雌激素。