Turenne Christine Y, Wallace Richard, Behr Marcel A
McGill University Health Centre, A5.156, 1650 Cedar Avenue, Montreal H3G 1A4, Canada.
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2007 Apr;20(2):205-29. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00036-06.
The past several years have witnessed an upsurge of genomic data pertaining to the Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC). Despite clear advances, problems with the detection of MAC persist, spanning the tests that can be used, samples required for their validation, and the use of appropriate nomenclature. Additionally, the amount of genomic variability documented to date greatly outstrips the functional understanding of epidemiologically different subsets of the organism. In this review, we discuss how postgenomic insights into the MAC have helped to clarify the relationships between MAC organisms, highlighting the distinction between environmental and pathogenic subsets of M. avium. We discuss the availability of various genetic targets for accurate classification of organisms and how these results provide a framework for future studies of MAC variability. The results of postgenomic M. avium study provide optimism that a functional understanding of these organisms will soon emerge, with genomically defined subsets that are epidemiologically distinct and possess different survival mechanisms for their various niches. Although the status quo has largely been to study different M. avium subsets in isolation, it is expected that attention to the similarities and differences between M. avium organisms will provide greater insight into their fundamental differences, including their propensity to cause disease.
在过去几年中,与鸟分枝杆菌复合群(MAC)相关的基因组数据激增。尽管取得了明显进展,但MAC检测方面的问题依然存在,涉及可使用的检测方法、验证所需的样本以及适当命名法的使用。此外,迄今为止记录的基因组变异性远远超过了对该生物体在流行病学上不同亚群的功能理解。在本综述中,我们讨论了对MAC的后基因组学见解如何有助于阐明MAC生物体之间的关系,强调了鸟分枝杆菌环境亚群和致病亚群之间的区别。我们讨论了用于准确分类生物体的各种遗传靶点的可用性,以及这些结果如何为未来MAC变异性研究提供框架。鸟分枝杆菌后基因组学研究的结果让人乐观地认为,很快就能对这些生物体有功能上的理解,即基因组定义的亚群在流行病学上是不同的,并且在其不同生态位具有不同的生存机制。尽管目前的现状主要是孤立地研究不同的鸟分枝杆菌亚群,但预计关注鸟分枝杆菌生物体之间的异同将更深入地了解它们的根本差异,包括它们致病的倾向。