Macy Rebecca J, Nurius Paula S, Norris Jeanette
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.
J Interpers Violence. 2007 May;22(5):520-42. doi: 10.1177/0886260506298839.
Little guidance exists about how to tailor empowerment and resistance sexual assault programming to be responsive to varying groups of women. Using an investigation of 415 college women who completed a self-administered survey about a range of sexually aggressive experiences by a known male assailant, this investigation tested for distinct multivariate profiles of contextual factors among sexually assaulted women to discern how these factors may differentially combine to influence women's vulnerability to sexual assault. We applied latent profile analysis (LPA) to determine meaningful subgroups of women based on interrelationships among factors that contextualize women's vulnerability to sexual assault, including prior victimization, alcohol consumption, relationship expectancies of the assailant, and assertive precautionary habits. LPA established four significantly distinct multivariate profiles of substantively different groups of women. Group difference tests reinforced the findings and aided in group profile interpretations. Implications for the development of tailored resistance and empowerment programs are discussed.
关于如何调整增强权能和预防性侵犯计划以适应不同女性群体的需求，目前几乎没有相关指导。通过对415名大学女性进行调查，她们完成了一份关于已知男性攻击者一系列性侵犯经历的自填式调查问卷，本研究测试了性侵犯女性中情境因素的不同多变量特征，以了解这些因素如何不同地组合起来影响女性遭受性侵犯的易感性。我们应用潜在类别分析（LPA），根据使女性易受性侵犯的因素之间的相互关系，确定有意义的女性亚组，这些因素包括先前的受害经历、饮酒情况、对攻击者的关系期望以及自信的预防习惯。LPA确定了四组本质上不同的女性的显著不同的多变量特征。组间差异测试强化了研究结果，并有助于对组特征进行解释。文中还讨论了制定针对性的抵抗和增强权能计划的意义。
