Kim Kihyun, Ryou Bee, Choi Jihyeon, Kim Jae-Won
Department of Social Welfare, College of Social Sciences, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Policy Research Institute, Incheon Metropolitan City Public Agency for Social Service, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Psychiatry Investig. 2021 Apr;18(4):312-323. doi: 10.30773/pi.2020.0141. Epub 2021 Apr 25.
Extant studies indicate that just one characteristic of sexual assault cannot properly represent the whole experience of sexual assault and, especially, the severity of sexual assault. This study aimed to understand the totality of sexual assault experiences and elucidate subtypes of sexual assault victims based on the detailed characteristics of their sexual assault experiences and those relationships with mental health.
A total of 255 adult sexual violence victims who used intervention services and a comparison group were included. Information on their sexual assault experiences was gleaned from case records data.
The following four distinctive profile groups were identified: "Sexual Touching" (19.6%), "Rape/Social Relation" (30.4%), "Intimate Partner Violence (IPV)" (18.8%), and "Rape/Stranger" (31.3%). The subgroups differed in terms of secondary victimization and adverse childhood experiences. The Rape/Social Relation and IPV subgroups most frequently experienced secondary victimization and childhood adversity. The four profile subgroups demonstrated different relationships with mental health outcomes, with a complicated pattern. The Rap/Social Relation and IPV subgroups scored higher on mental health problem screening measures compared to other groups. However, a considerable proportion of victims in the Sexual Touching subgroup also reported suicidal behaviors and self-injury.
Based on the results, theoretical and clinical implications were discussed.
现有研究表明,性侵犯的单一特征无法恰当地代表性侵犯的整体经历,尤其是性侵犯的严重程度。本研究旨在了解性侵犯经历的全貌,并根据性侵犯经历的详细特征及其与心理健康的关系,阐明性侵犯受害者的亚型。
共纳入255名使用干预服务的成年性暴力受害者和一个对照组。他们性侵犯经历的信息从病例记录数据中收集。
确定了以下四个不同的特征组:“性接触”(19.6%)、“强奸/社会关系”(30.4%)、“亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)”(18.8%)和“强奸/陌生人”(31.3%)。这些亚组在二次受害和童年不良经历方面存在差异。“强奸/社会关系”和“亲密伴侣暴力”亚组最常经历二次受害和童年逆境。这四个特征亚组与心理健康结果呈现出不同且复杂的关系模式。“强奸/社会关系”和“亲密伴侣暴力”亚组在心理健康问题筛查指标上的得分高于其他组。然而,“性接触”亚组中相当一部分受害者也报告有自杀行为和自我伤害行为。
基于研究结果,对理论和临床意义进行了讨论。