Jee Sandra H, Cabana Michael D
University of Rochester, USA.
Med Care Res Rev. 2006 Apr;63(2):158-88. doi: 10.1177/1077558705285294.
This article systematically reviews published literature on different continuity of care (COC) indices that assess the physician-patient relationship and the applicability of such indices to pediatric and chronic-disease patient populations. Frequency and visit type may vary for pediatric and chronically ill patients versus healthy adult patients. Two investigators independently examined 5,070 candidate articles and identified 246 articles related to COC. Forty-four articles were identified that include 32 different indices used to measure COC. Indices were classified into those that calculated COC primarily based on duration of provider relationship (n=2), density of visits (n=17), dispersion of providers (n=8), sequence of providers (n=1), or subjective estimates (n=4). The diversity of COC indices reflect differences in how this measure is conceptualized. No index takes into account the visit type. A unique index that reflects continuity in the physician patient relationship for pediatric and chronic disease populations is needed.
本文系统回顾了已发表的关于不同连续性护理(COC)指标的文献,这些指标用于评估医患关系以及此类指标在儿科和慢性病患者群体中的适用性。儿科患者和慢性病患者与健康成年患者相比,就诊频率和就诊类型可能有所不同。两名研究人员独立审查了5070篇候选文章,确定了246篇与COC相关的文章。其中44篇文章包含用于衡量COC的32种不同指标。这些指标分为主要基于医疗服务提供者关系持续时间计算COC的指标(n = 2)、就诊密度指标(n = 17)、医疗服务提供者分散程度指标(n = 8)、医疗服务提供者顺序指标(n = 1)或主观评估指标(n = 4)。COC指标的多样性反映了该测量方法在概念化方面的差异。没有一个指标考虑到就诊类型。需要一个独特的指标来反映儿科和慢性病患者群体中医患关系的连续性。